Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36974216›Full record

ReviewJDS communications2023

The high fertility cycle.

P M Fricke, M C Wiltbank, J R Pursley

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in JDS communications, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Foundational reproduction programs for U.S. dairy herds.The Journal of reproduction and development · 2026
    Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

P M FrickeDepartment of Animal and Dairy Sciences, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison 53706.
M C WiltbankDepartment of Animal and Dairy Sciences, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison 53706.
J R PursleyDepartment of Animal Science, Michigan State University, East Lansing 48824.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The development of fertility programs and their adoption by the dairy industry over the past decade is a major driving factor underlying the dramatic increase in reproductive performance in lactating dairy cows during the past 20 years. Another major driving factor underlying this increase in reproductive performance is what we describe in this minireview as the "high fertility cycle." We now know that reproductive performance and the incidence of certain periparturient health events are interrelated. The high fertility cycle describes the relationship between body condition score (BCS) change during the periparturient period and postpartum health events and subsequent reproductive performance in which lactating dairy cows that establish pregnancy by 130 d in milk have shorter calving intervals and thereby gain less BCS during the current lactation and dry off and calve at a lower BCS (2.75 to 3.0) than cows with a longer lactation. After calving, these cows undergo less BCS loss, experience fewer health issues, have greater fertility at first insemination, and have reduced early pregnancy losses after establishment of pregnancy and thereby become pregnant before 130 d in milk. This minireview overviews these relationships and highlights the key concepts underlying the high fertility cycle. Future randomized, controlled experiments are needed to causally link these relationships between BCS change and fertility in lactating dairy cows.

Identifiers

PMID36974216
PMCPMC10039251

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.