ArticleJournal of clinical orthopaedics and trauma2023
"Trends and beliefs in ACL reconstruction surgery: Indian perspectives".
Article in Journal of clinical orthopaedics and trauma, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- Rehabilitation In Arthroscopic Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction.Journal of orthopaedic case reports · 2025Article
- Accuracy of femoral tunnel placement using three different techniques in performing arthroscopic all-inside anterior Cruciate Ligament reconstruction; A randomized study.Journal of clinical orthopaedics and trauma · 2024Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objectives: The survey aimed to assess trends and beliefs in the management of anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) amongst orthopaedic surgeons in India. Methods: A survey was created and distributed among the various orthopaedic surgeons from India. The questionnaire included brief details of surgeons and their experience, clinical assessment, management strategies and the rehabilitation protocol. Results: 135 surgeons completed the survey. 35% of them were having experience of more than 12 years. A large number of surgeons were from government academic institutes (35.5%). The most common criteria for deciding about surgery was Clinical evaluation (94.8%). The most common graft choice was hamstring tendon (94%), and suspensory fixation on the femur side and interference screw on the tibial side (80%) is the most common fixation method. Almost two-thirds of surgeons in this survey use bracing to protect ACL graft in the initial phase. Conclusion: We presented the preferences amongst the group of surgeons on the management of ACL injuries. Hamstring tendon graft remains the most preferred graft for ACL reconstruction. Further, the suspensory loop on the femoral side and interference screw on the tibial side are the preferred fixation method. This group of surgeons is conservative in terms of the timing of surgeries and post-operative bracing. Level of evidence Level V, Expert Opinion.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.