Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36974088›Full record

ReviewJournal of orthopaedics2023

Corona Mortise- anatomical variants and implications in pelvic-acetabular surgery: An evidence based review.

Abhay Elhence, Akshat Gupta

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of orthopaedics, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Abhay ElhenceDepartment Of Orthopaedics, All India Institute Of Medical Sciences, Jodhpur, Rajasthan, 342005, India.
Akshat GuptaDepartment Of Orthopaedics, All India Institute Of Medical Sciences, Jodhpur, Rajasthan, 342005, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Corona Mortise is the name given to the anastomotic vessels forming a communication between external and internal iliac vascular systems. These channels have a high tendency to cause uncontrollable bleeding if injured and are particularly at risk during the anterior approach to acetabulum. While previous studies have described them as arterial or venous connections or both, there is still a lack of consensus regarding exact nature and location of these vessels, which make their timely identification all the more challenging. Objective: The present review is aimed at performing a comprehensive review of existing literature and discuss the anatomy and implications of correct identification of Corona Mortise in pelvic-acetabular surgery. Conclusion: Corona Mortise is more commonly venous than arterial. This not only makes haemorrhage control more challenging but also precludes the use of pre-operative angiography. However, most authors do not recommend a change in surgical approach for fear of damaging these vessels.

Indexed as

Anatomical variantsCorona mortiseHaemorrhagePelvic-acetabular surgery

Identifiers

PMID36974088
PMCPMC10039118

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.