Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36974077›Full record

ArticlePatient preference and adherence2023

Sickle Cell Disease Knowledge and Reproductive Decisions: A Saudi Cross-Sectional Study.

Mortadah Alsalman, Hassan Alhamoud, Zainab Alabdullah, Raghad Alsleem, Zainab Almarzooq, Fatemah Alsalem, Ahmed Alsulaiman, Abdullah Albeladi, Zaenb Alsalman

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Patient preference and adherence, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
2.6field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Observational
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Love vs. Risk: Women with Sickle Cell Disease Face Reproductive Decision-Making Dilemmas.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2025
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Mortadah AlsalmanDepartment of Medicine, College of Medicine, King Faisal University, Al Ahsa, Saudi Arabia.ORCID 0000-0003-3975-5550
Hassan AlhamoudDepartment of Medicine, King Fahad Hospital, Al Hofuf, Saudi Arabia.
Zainab AlabdullahDepartment of Medicine, College of Medicine, King Faisal University, Al Ahsa, Saudi Arabia.
Raghad AlsleemDepartment of Medicine, College of Medicine, King Faisal University, Al Ahsa, Saudi Arabia.
Zainab AlmarzooqDepartment of Medicine, College of Medicine, King Faisal University, Al Ahsa, Saudi Arabia.
Fatemah AlsalemDepartment of Medicine, College of Medicine, King Faisal University, Al Ahsa, Saudi Arabia.
Ahmed AlsulaimanCollege of Medicine, Vision Colleges, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Abdullah AlbeladiDepartment of Medicine, King Fahad Hospital, Al Hofuf, Saudi Arabia.
Zaenb AlsalmanDepartments of Family and Community Medicine, College of Medicine, King Faisal University, Al Ahsa, Saudi Arabia.ORCID 0000-0002-1008-7977
King Faisal University · SAKing Fahad Hospital Hufūf · SASion College · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background and Aim: Sickle cell disease (SCD) is an autosomal recessive disorder. Decisions following premarital screening results might be influenced by several factors. Thus, this study aims to assess the knowledge and beliefs toward SCD and reproductive decisions. Material and Methods: A cross-sectional study was conducted among adults in the eastern province of Saudi Arabia. Data was collected using a web-based questionnaire. Participants were divided into two groups based on their knowledge scores. Results: A total of 390 participants were recruited with a mean age of 28.6 years. The majority (90.5%) of participants had general knowledge about the disease mode of inheritance however, 66.9% had poor knowledge about the disease overall. Regarding knowledge level, there was no statistically significant difference between the non-healthy group (diseased and carrier) and healthy participants (P=0.304). Moreover, the participants' decisions about choosing future partners were more likely to be affected among those with prior knowledge about the disease (p=0.008). However, 152 (91.6%) male participants with prior knowledge would change their decision about selecting a future partner compared to 225 (92.4%) female participants. Regarding reproduction, only 38.5% of participants were aware of in vitro fertilization (IVF) as an assistive reproductive technology. Furthermore, female participants believed that IVF is a way to have healthy babies and would consider it despite the cost more than male participants (p=0.0001, p=0.007 respectively). Conclusion: SCD is an inherited disease with economic, physical, and psychological burdens. However, curative options are costly, and hence, prevention is key. Therefore, healthcare decision-makers should consider implementing policies to minimize the financial burden that may still affect society despite the availability of free medical care. This study warrants extensive community-based education programs that may contribute toward cost savings. It also highlights the importance of premarital counselling for disease and carrier people including alternative reproduction options.

Indexed as

counsellingin vitro fertilizationsickle cell disease

Identifiers

PMID36974077
PMCPMC10039637
OpenAlexW4328110941

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.