Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36973715›Full record

ReviewGenome biology2023

Ageing as a software design flaw.

João Pedro de Magalhães

Full text readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Genome biology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 37 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
37citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

37 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Reversing aging-like 3D genome disorganization in abioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Anti-aging effect of Hedgehog signaling.Experimental & molecular medicine · 2026
    Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Quantification of Epigenetic Aging in Public Health.Annual review of public health · 2025
    Review
  16. Article
  17. The ageing virus hypothesis: Epigenetic ageing beyond the Tree of Life.BioEssays : news and reviews in molecular, cellular and developmental biology · 2025
    Review
  18. Epigenetic clocks and programmatic aging.Ageing research reviews · 2024
    Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

João Pedro de MagalhãesGenomics of Ageing and Rejuvenation Lab, Institute of Inflammation and Ageing, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, B15 2WB, UK. jp@senescence.info.

Funding

Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BB/R014949/1Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BB/V010123/1Wellcome TrustWellcome Trust 208375/Z/17/Z
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Ageing is inherent to all human beings, yet why we age remains a hotly contested topic. Most mechanistic explanations of ageing posit that ageing is caused by the accumulation of one or more forms of molecular damage. Here, I propose that we age not because of inevitable damage to the hardware but rather because of intrinsic design flaws in the software, defined as the DNA code that orchestrates how a single cell develops into an adult organism. As the developmental software runs, its sequence of events is reflected in shifting cellular epigenetic states. Overall, I suggest that to understand ageing we need to decode our software and the flow of epigenetic information throughout the life course.

Indexed as

AgingLongevityHumansSelection, GeneticSoftware DesignAntagonistic pleiotropyGenomeInformation theoryLongevityProgrammed ageing

Identifiers

PMID36973715
PMCPMC10042583

What OpenQuestion holds

Textfull text, public
LicenceCC BY
measurements read1
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.