Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36973705›Full record

ArticleBMC public health2023

A mixed-methods exploration of attitudes towards pregnant Facebook fitness influencers.

Melanie Hayman, Marian Keppel, Robert Stanton, Tanya L Thwaite, Kristie-Lee Alfrey, Stephanie Alley, Cheryce Harrison, Shelley E Keating, Stephanie Schoeppe, Summer S Cannon and 3 more

Full text read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC public health, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Melanie HaymanAppleton Institute, School of Health Medical and Applied Sciences, Central Queensland University, Bruce Highway, North Rockhampton, Brisbane, QLD, 4702, Australia. m.j.hayman@cqu.edu.au.
Marian KeppelAppleton Institute, School of Health Medical and Applied Sciences, Central Queensland University, Bruce Highway, North Rockhampton, Brisbane, QLD, 4702, Australia.
Robert StantonAppleton Institute, School of Health Medical and Applied Sciences, Central Queensland University, Bruce Highway, North Rockhampton, Brisbane, QLD, 4702, Australia.
Tanya L ThwaiteAppleton Institute, School of Health Medical and Applied Sciences, Central Queensland University, Bruce Highway, North Rockhampton, Brisbane, QLD, 4702, Australia.
Kristie-Lee AlfreyAppleton Institute, School of Health Medical and Applied Sciences, Central Queensland University, Bruce Highway, North Rockhampton, Brisbane, QLD, 4702, Australia.
Stephanie AlleyAppleton Institute, School of Health Medical and Applied Sciences, Central Queensland University, Bruce Highway, North Rockhampton, Brisbane, QLD, 4702, Australia.
Cheryce HarrisonSchool of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Wellington Road, Melbourne, Australia.
Shelley E KeatingSchool of Human Movement and Nutrition Sciences, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, QLD, 4072, Australia.
Stephanie SchoeppeAppleton Institute, School of Health Medical and Applied Sciences, Central Queensland University, Bruce Highway, North Rockhampton, Brisbane, QLD, 4702, Australia.
Summer S CannonAppleton Institute, School of Health Medical and Applied Sciences, Central Queensland University, Bruce Highway, North Rockhampton, Brisbane, QLD, 4702, Australia.
Lene A H HaakstadDepartment of Sports Medicine, Norwegian School of Sports Sciences, Ullevål Stadion Melbourne, P.O Box 4014, Oslo, VIC, 3800 0806, Norway.
Christina GjestvangDepartment of Sports Medicine, Norwegian School of Sports Sciences, Ullevål Stadion Melbourne, P.O Box 4014, Oslo, VIC, 3800 0806, Norway.
Susan L WilliamsAppleton Institute, School of Health Medical and Applied Sciences, Central Queensland University, Bruce Highway, North Rockhampton, Brisbane, QLD, 4702, Australia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundExercise during pregnancy is associated with various health benefits for both mother and child. Despite these benefits, most pregnant women do not meet physical activity recommendations. A known barrier to engaging in exercise during pregnancy is a lack of knowledge about appropriate and safe exercise. In our current era of social media, many pregnant women are turning to online information sources for guidance, including social media influencers. Little is known about attitudes towards pregnancy exercise information provided by influencers on social media platforms. This study aimed to explore attitudes towards exercise during pregnancy depicted by social media influencers on Facebook, and user engagement with posted content.

methodsA mixed-methods approach was used to analyse data from 10 Facebook video posts of social media influencers exercising during pregnancy. Quantitative descriptive analyses were used to report the number of views, shares, comments and emotive reactions. Qualitative analysis of user comments was achieved using an inductive thematic approach.

resultsThe 10 video posts analysed were viewed a total of 12,117,200 times, shared on 11,181 occasions, included 13,455 user comments and 128,804 emotive icon reactions, with the most frequently used icon being 'like' (81.48%). The thematic analysis identified three themes associated with attitudes including [1] exercise during pregnancy [2] influencers and [3] type of exercise. A fourth theme of community was also identified. Most user comments were associated with positive attitudes towards exercise during pregnancy and the influencer. However, attitudes towards the types of exercise the influencer performed were mixed (aerobic and body weight exercises were positive; resistance-based exercise with weights were negative). Finally, the online community perceived by users was mostly positive and recognised for offering social support and guidance.

conclusionsUser comments imply resistance-based exercise with weights as unsafe and unnecessary when pregnant, a perception that does not align with current best practice guidelines. Collectively, the findings from this study highlight the need for continued education regarding exercise during pregnancy and the potential for social media influencers to disseminate evidence-based material to pregnant women who are highly receptive to, and in need of reliable health information.

Indexed as

Social MediaChildExerciseExercise TherapyFemaleHumansPregnancyPregnant PeopleSocial SupportAttitudesExerciseFacebookPregnancySocial media influencer

Identifiers

PMID36973705
PMCPMC10041693

What OpenQuestion holds

Textfull text, public
LicenceCC BY
measurements read9
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.