Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36973642›Full record

ArticleBMC genomics2023

Comparative physiological and transcriptome analysis in cultivated and wild sugarcane species in response to hydrogen peroxide-induced oxidative stress.

R Manimekalai, A Selvi, Jini Narayanan, Ram Vannish, R Shalini, S Gayathri, V P Rabisha

Full text read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC genomics, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

R ManimekalaiCrop Improvement Division, Sugarcane Breeding Institute, Indian Council of Agricultural Research (ICAR), Coimbatore, Tamil Nadu, 641 007, India. r.manimekalai@icar.gov.in.
A SelviCrop Improvement Division, Sugarcane Breeding Institute, Indian Council of Agricultural Research (ICAR), Coimbatore, Tamil Nadu, 641 007, India.
Jini NarayananCrop Improvement Division, Sugarcane Breeding Institute, Indian Council of Agricultural Research (ICAR), Coimbatore, Tamil Nadu, 641 007, India.
Ram VannishCrop Improvement Division, Sugarcane Breeding Institute, Indian Council of Agricultural Research (ICAR), Coimbatore, Tamil Nadu, 641 007, India.
R ShaliniCrop Improvement Division, Sugarcane Breeding Institute, Indian Council of Agricultural Research (ICAR), Coimbatore, Tamil Nadu, 641 007, India.
S GayathriCrop Improvement Division, Sugarcane Breeding Institute, Indian Council of Agricultural Research (ICAR), Coimbatore, Tamil Nadu, 641 007, India.
V P RabishaCrop Improvement Division, Sugarcane Breeding Institute, Indian Council of Agricultural Research (ICAR), Coimbatore, Tamil Nadu, 641 007, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSugarcane is an important energy crop grown worldwide,supplementing various renewable energy sources. Cultivated and wild sugarcane species respond differently to biotic and abiotic stresses. Generally, wild species are tolerant to various abiotic stresses. In the present study, the physiological and molecular responses of cultivated and wild sugarcane species to oxidative stress at the transcriptional levels were compared. Transcriptional responses were determined using RNAseq. The representative RNA-seq transcript values were validated by reverse transcriptase quantitative polymerase chain reaction (RT-qPCR) and confirmed through physiological responses.

resultsOxidative stress causes leaf-rolling and -tip drying in cultivated sugarcane, but the wild species are tolerant. Higher chlorophyll fluorescence was observed in the wild species than that in the cultivated varieties under stress. Wild species can maintain a higher chlorophyll stability index than the cultivated species, which was confirmed by the lower transcripts of the chlorophyllase gene in the wild species than that in the cultivated variety. Transcription factor genes (NAC, MYB, and WRKY) were markedly expressed in response to oxidative stress, revealing their involvement in stress tolerance. The analysis revealed synchronized expression of acetyl-transferase, histone2A, cellulose synthase, and secondary cell wall biosynthetic genes in the wild species. The validation of selected genes and 15 NAC transcription factors using RT-qPCR revealed that their expression profiles were strongly correlated with RNA-seq. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first report on the oxidative stress response in cultivated and wild sugarcane species.

conclusionPhysiological and biochemical changes in response to oxidative stress markedly differ between cultivated and wild sugarcane species. The differentially expressed stress-responsive genes are grouped intothe response to oxidative stress, heme-binding, peroxidase activity, and metal ion binding categories. Chlorophyll maintenance is a stress tolerance response enhanced by the differential regulation of the chlorophyllase gene.There is a considerable difference in the chlorophyll stability index between wild and cultivated varieties. We observed a substantial regulation of secondary wall biosynthesis genes in the wild species compared with that in the cultivated variety, suggesting differences in stress tolerance mechanisms.

Indexed as

SaccharumChlorophyllGene Expression ProfilingGene Expression Regulation, PlantHydrogen PeroxideOxidative StressPlant ProteinsStress, PhysiologicalTranscriptomeChlorophyllHydrogen PeroxidePlant ProteinsErianthus spNAC genesSaccharum spsugarcane transcriptome

Identifiers

PMID36973642
PMCPMC10045617

What OpenQuestion holds

Textfull text, public
LicenceCC BY
reference markers read1
measurements read24
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.