Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36973592›Full record

ArticleJournal of experimental orthopaedics2023

Finite element analysis of medial closing and lateral opening wedge osteotomies of the distal femur in relation to hinge fractures.

Michel Meisterhans, Andreas Flury, Christoph Zindel, Stefan M Zimmermann, Lazaros Vlachopoulos, Jess G Snedeker, Sandro F Fucentese

Full text read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of experimental orthopaedics, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. In closed wedge distal femur osteotomies for correction of valgus malalignment overcorrection of mLDFA should be avoided.Knee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal of the ESSKA · 2023
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Michel MeisterhansDepartment of Orthopedics, Balgrist University Hospital, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland. michel.meisterhans@balgrist.ch.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2478-3877
Andreas FluryDepartment of Orthopedics, Balgrist University Hospital, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
Christoph ZindelDepartment of Orthopedics, Balgrist University Hospital, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
Stefan M ZimmermannDepartment of Orthopedics, Balgrist University Hospital, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
Lazaros VlachopoulosDepartment of Orthopedics, Balgrist University Hospital, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
Jess G SnedekerDepartment of Orthopedics, Balgrist University Hospital, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
Sandro F FucenteseDepartment of Orthopedics, Balgrist University Hospital, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeIntraoperative hinge fractures in distal femur osteotomies represent a risk factor for loss of alignment and non-union. Using finite element analysis, the goal of this study was to investigate the influence of different hinge widths and osteotomy corrections on hinge fractures in medial closed-wedge and lateral open-wedge distal femur osteotomies.

methodsThe hinge was located at the proximal margin of adductor tubercle for biplanar lateral open-wedge and at the upper border of the lateral femoral condyle for biplanar medial closed-wedge distal femur osteotomies, corresponding to optimal hinge positions described in literature. Different hinge widths (5, 7.5, 10 mm) were created and the osteotomy correction was opened/closed by 5, 7.5 and 10 mm. Tensile and compressive strain of the hinge was determined in a finite element analysis and compared to the ultimate strain of cortical bone to assess the hinge fracture risk.

resultsDoubling the correction from 5 to 10 mm increased mean tensile and compressive strain by 50% for lateral open-wedge and 48% for medial closed-wedge osteotomies. A hinge width of 10 mm versus 5 mm showed increased strain in the hinge region of 61% for lateral open-wedge and 32% for medial closed-wedge osteotomies. Medial closed-wedge recorded a higher fracture risk compared to lateral open-wedge osteotomies due to a larger hinge cross-section area (60-67%) for all tested configurations. In case of a 5 mm hinge, medial closed-wedge recorded 71% higher strain in the hinge region compared to lateral open-wedge osteotomies.

conclusionDue to morphological features of the medial femoral condyle, finite element analysis suggests that lateral-open wedge osteotomies are the preferable option if larger corrections are intended, as a thicker hinge can remain without an increased hinge fracture risk.

Indexed as

BiomechanicsDistal femur osteotomiesFinite element analysisHinge fracture riskLateral open wedgeMedial closed wedgeStatistical shape model

Identifiers

PMID36973592
PMCPMC10043162

What OpenQuestion holds

Textfull text, public
LicenceCC BY
measurements read21
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.