ArticlePaediatric drugs2023
Dose Rationale of Nasal Glucagon in Japanese Pediatric Patients with Diabetes Using Pharmacokinetic/Pharmacodynamic Modeling and Simulation.
Article in Paediatric drugs, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundNasal glucagon (NG) 3 mg is approved in Japan to treat hypoglycemia in pediatric patients with diabetes, but an NG clinical study has not been performed in Japanese children because of practical and ethical concerns.
objectiveThe aim of this study is to support the dose rationale for NG 3 mg in Japanese pediatric patients with diabetes using modeling and simulation.
methodsWe used a pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic bridging approach to extrapolate the available clinical data to Japanese pediatric patients. Population pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic modeling was performed using data from seven clinical studies, including five studies in non-Japanese adults, one study in Japanese adults, and one study in non-Japanese pediatric patients. Simulation was then used to estimate glucagon exposure and glucose response after NG 3-mg administration for three age categories of Japanese pediatric patients: 4 to < 8, 8 to < 12, and 12 to < 18 years. Treatment success was defined as an increase in blood glucose to ≥ 70 or ≥ 20 mg/dL from nadir within 30 min after administration of NG 3 mg. Safety was assessed in relation to the predicted maximum glucagon concentration of NG 3 mg using NG clinical trial data and published data on intravenous and intramuscular glucagon.
resultsThe data showed a rapid and robust glucose response following NG 3 mg in Japanese and non-Japanese adults and non-Japanese pediatric patients, with some differences in glucagon exposure observed across studies. The pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic model described the observed clinical data well, and simulations indicated that > 99% of hypoglycemic Japanese pediatric patients in all three age groups would achieve treatment success. Predicted glucose responses to NG 3 mg in Japanese pediatric patients were comparable to those of intramuscular glucagon. Maximum concentration was not associated with the occurrence and severity of common adverse events (nausea, vomiting, and headache) in NG clinical studies. Furthermore, the predicted maximum concentration in Japanese pediatric patients, despite being higher than the observed maximum concentration in NG clinical studies, was substantially lower than the observed maximum concentration of 1 mg of intravenous glucagon, without serious safety issues.
conclusionsThis analysis suggests NG 3 mg has robust efficacy without serious safety concerns in Japanese pediatric patients with diabetes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.