Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36973336›Full record

ArticleISME communications2023

Linking prokaryotic genome size variation to metabolic potential and environment.

Alejandro Rodríguez-Gijón, Moritz Buck, Anders F Andersson, Dandan Izabel-Shen, Francisco J A Nascimento, Sarahi L Garcia

Open access · goldFull text read
In one paragraph

Article in ISME communications, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed
6.2field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed, 25 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Nitrogen-fixing microbes gain genes in diverse types of living environments.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Hindguts ofmSystems · 2025
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Alejandro Rodríguez-GijónDepartment of Ecology, Environment and Plant Sciences, Stockholm University, Stockholm, 106 91, Sweden. alejandro.rgijon@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1649-6894
Moritz BuckDepartment of Aquatic Sciences and Assessment, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Uppsala, Sweden.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6632-5324
Anders F AnderssonScience for Life Laboratory, Stockholm, Sweden.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3627-6899
Dandan Izabel-ShenDepartment of Ecology, Environment and Plant Sciences, Stockholm University, Stockholm, 106 91, Sweden.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3280-1166
Francisco J A NascimentoDepartment of Ecology, Environment and Plant Sciences, Stockholm University, Stockholm, 106 91, Sweden.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3722-1360
Sarahi L GarciaDepartment of Ecology, Environment and Plant Sciences, Stockholm University, Stockholm, 106 91, Sweden. sarahi.garcia@su.se.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8622-0308
Stockholm University · SEScience for Life Laboratory · SESwedish University of Agricultural Sciences · SE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

While theories and models have appeared to explain genome size as a result of evolutionary processes, little work has shown that genome sizes carry ecological signatures. Our work delves into the ecological implications of microbial genome size variation in benthic and pelagic habitats across environmental gradients of the brackish Baltic Sea. While depth is significantly associated with genome size in benthic and pelagic brackish metagenomes, salinity is only correlated to genome size in benthic metagenomes. Overall, we confirm that prokaryotic genome sizes in Baltic sediments (3.47 Mbp) are significantly bigger than in the water column (2.96 Mbp). While benthic genomes have a higher number of functions than pelagic genomes, the smallest genomes coded for a higher number of module steps per Mbp for most of the functions irrespective of their environment. Some examples of this functions are amino acid metabolism and central carbohydrate metabolism. However, we observed that nitrogen metabolism was almost absent in pelagic genomes and was mostly present in benthic genomes. Finally, we also show that Bacteria inhabiting Baltic sediments and water column not only differ in taxonomy, but also in their metabolic potential, such as the Wood-Ljungdahl pathway or the presence of different hydrogenases. Our work shows how microbial genome size is linked to abiotic factors in the environment, metabolic potential and taxonomic identity of Bacteria and Archaea within aquatic ecosystems.

Identifiers

PMID36973336
PMCPMC10042847
OpenAlexW4360998960

What OpenQuestion holds

Textfull text, public
LicenceCC BY
measurements read50
table measurements read5
reference markers read1
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.