Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36973177›Full record

ArticleObstetrics & gynecology science2023

The introduction to air pollution on pregnancy outcome (APPO) study: a multicenter cohort study.

Young Min Hur, Sunwha Park, Eunjin Kwon, Young-Ah You, AbuZar Ansari, Soo Min Kim, Gain Lee, Mi Hye Park, Kyung A Lee, Soo Jung Kim and 13 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Obstetrics & gynecology science, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Association Between Individual Air Pollution (PMJournal of Korean medical science · 2024
    Observational
  4. Article
  5. Personal exposure of PMEnvironmental science and pollution research international · 2023
    Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

23 authors.

Young Min HurDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Ewha Womans University Mokdong Hospital, Ewha Medical Research Institute College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
Sunwha ParkDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Ewha Womans University Mokdong Hospital, Ewha Medical Research Institute College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
Eunjin KwonDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Ewha Womans University Mokdong Hospital, Ewha Medical Research Institute College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
Young-Ah YouDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Ewha Womans University Mokdong Hospital, Ewha Medical Research Institute College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
AbuZar AnsariDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Ewha Womans University Mokdong Hospital, Ewha Medical Research Institute College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
Soo Min KimDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Ewha Womans University Mokdong Hospital, Ewha Medical Research Institute College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
Gain LeeDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Ewha Womans University Mokdong Hospital, Ewha Medical Research Institute College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
Mi Hye ParkDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Ewha Womans University Seoul Hospital, Seoul, Korea.
Kyung A LeeDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Ewha Womans University Seoul Hospital, Seoul, Korea.
Soo Jung KimDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Ewha Womans University Seoul Hospital, Seoul, Korea.
Young-Han KimDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Yonsei University, Seoul, Korea.
Yeon-Sung JungDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Yonsei University Gangnam Severance Hospital, Seoul, Korea.
Geum Joon ChoDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Korea University Guro Hospital, Seoul, Korea.
Min-Jeong OhDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Korea University Guro Hospital, Seoul, Korea.
Sung Hun NaDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Kangwon National University Hospital, Chuncheon, Korea.
Se Jin LeeDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Kangwon National University Hospital, Chuncheon, Korea.
Tae Gyu AnDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Kangwon National University Hospital, Chuncheon, Korea.
Jin-Gon BaeDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Keimyung University Dongsan Medical Center, Daegu, Korea.
Yu-Hwan KimDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Keimyung University Dongsan Medical Center, Daegu, Korea.
Soo-Jeong LeeDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Ulsan University Hospital, Ulsan, Korea.
Na Kyung KimDepartment of Environmental Science and Engineering, College of Medicine, Ewha Medical Research Institute, Ewha Womans University, Seoul, Korea.
Eun-Hee HaDepartment of Preventive Medicine, College of Medicine, Ewha Medical Research Institute, Ewha Womans University, Seoul, Korea.
Young Ju KimDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Ewha Womans University Mokdong Hospital, Ewha Medical Research Institute College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.

Funding

Korea National Institute of Health 2021-ER1208-01
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveThe air pollution on pregnancy outcome (APPO) study is a prospective hospital-based cohort study designed to investigate the maternal and fetal effects of a particulate matter with an aerodynamic below 10 μm (PM10) and PM2.5 (below 2.5 μm) exposure. This study aims to analyze a relationship between particulate matter and adverse pregnancy outcomes and to find related biomarkers and develop management guidelines.

methodsAbout 1,200 pregnant women are recruited for 3 years (from January 2021 to December 2023) from seven university hospitals to investigate the effects of particulate matter on pregnancy complications and adverse pregnancy outcomes. We collect biological samples by 5 mL of maternal venous blood and 15 mL of urine in each trimester of pregnancy, and 5 mL of umbilical cord blood and 2×2×2 cm of placental tissue are collected after delivery. In addition, by applying PM10 and PM2.5 concentration values and time-activity patterns from the time weighted average model, the individual predicted exposure of air pollution for the pregnant women are obtained.

resultsThe average exposure of PM10 and PM2.5 of the participants in the entire period of pregnancy, was exceeded the World Health Organization air quality guidelines (an annual level, PM10 >15 μg/m3, PM2.5 >5 μg/m3). Moreover, it was revealed that the PM concentration was increasing toward the 3rd trimester of pregnancy.

conclusionThe APPO study will be able to identify the degree of exposure to air pollution in pregnant women and use it as basic data for estimating individual exposure to particulate matter. And the results of the APPO study will facilitate in the development of health management for pregnant women against air pollution.

Indexed as

Air pollutionEnvironmental exposureParticulate matterPregnancy complicationsPregnant women

Identifiers

PMID36973177
PMCPMC10191769

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.