ArticleAnnals of family medicine
Patient-Reported Social Risks and Clinician Decision Making: Results of a Clinician Survey in Primary Care Community Health Centers.
Article in Annals of family medicine. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed.
- SDOH Data as Health Care Data: The Multifaceted, Evolving, and Consequential Role of Law and Policy.Advances in health information science and practice · 2026Review
- Integration of Screening and Referral Tools for Social Determinants of Health and Modifiable Lifestyle Factors in the Epic Electronic Health Record System: Scoping Review.Journal of medical Internet research · 2025Article
- Reducing barriers to care in the treatment of lung cancer: a narrative review.Journal of thoracic disease · 2025Review
- A Pilot Comparison of Clinical Data Collection Methods Using Paper, Electronic Health Record Prompt, and a Smartphone Application.Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine : JABFM · 2025Article
- Area-level socioeconomic inequalities in hypertension care cascade in China: a nationwide population-based study based on the ChinaHEART project.The Lancet regional health. Western Pacific · 2025Article
- Health-Related Social Needs Discussions in Primary Care Encounters in Safety-Net Clinics: A Qualitative Analysis.JAMA network open · 2025Article
- Patient-Reported Social Risk Factor Screening Among Rheumatology Outpatients.ACR open rheumatology · 2025Article
- Applying Realist Retroduction to EHR-Based Clinical Decision Support Tool Development.International journal of qualitative methods · 2025Article
- Associations between Social Adversities and Chronic Medical Conditions in a Statewide Sample of Individuals in Treatment for Mental Illnesses.Community mental health journal · 2024Article
- Toward standardization, harmonization, and integration of social determinants of health data: A Texas Clinical and Translational Science Award institutions collaboration.Journal of clinical and translational science · 2024Article
- Finding meaning: a realist-informed perspective on social risk screening and relationships as mechanisms of change.Frontiers in health services · 2023Article
- "We Need to Know These Things": Use Cases for Combined Social and Clinical Data Among Primary Care-Based Clinical and Social Care Providers.Journal of primary care & community healthArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purposeTo assess the extent that patients' social determinants of health (SDOH) influence safety-net primary care clinicians' decisions at the point of care; examine how that information comes to the clinician's attention; and analyze clinician, patient, and encounter characteristics associated with the use of SDOH data in clinical decision making.
methodsThirty-eight clinicians working in 21 clinics were prompted to complete 2 short card surveys embedded in the electronic health record (EHR) daily for 3 weeks. Survey data were matched with clinician-, encounter-, and patient-level variables from the EHR. Descriptive statistics and generalized estimating equation models were used to assess relationships between the variables and the clinician reported use of SDOH data to inform care.
resultsSocial determinants of health were reported to influence care in 35% of surveyed encounters. The most common sources of information on patients' SDOH were conversations with patients (76%), prior knowledge (64%), and the EHR (46%). Social determinants of health were significantly more likely to influence care among male and non-English-speaking patients, and those with discrete SDOH screening data documented in the EHR.
conclusionsElectronic health records present an opportunity to support clinicians integrating information about patients' social and economic circumstances into care planning. Study findings suggest that SDOH information from standardized screening documented in the EHR, combined with patient-clinician conversations, may enable social risk-adjusted care. Electronic health record tools and clinic workflows could be used to support both documentation and conversations. Study results also identified factors that may cue clinicians to include SDOH information in point-of-care decision-making. Future research should explore this topic further.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.