Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36973053›Full record

ArticleAnnals of family medicine

Patient-Reported Social Risks and Clinician Decision Making: Results of a Clinician Survey in Primary Care Community Health Centers.

Arwen Bunce, Jenna Donovan, Megan Hoopes, Laura M Gottlieb, Molly Krancari, Rachel Gold

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Annals of family medicine. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Arwen BunceOCHIN Inc, Portland, Oregon buncea@ochin.org.
Jenna DonovanOCHIN Inc, Portland, Oregon.
Megan HoopesOCHIN Inc, Portland, Oregon.
Laura M GottliebDepartment of Family and Community Medicine, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California.
Molly KrancariOCHIN Inc, Portland, Oregon.
Rachel GoldOCHIN Inc, Portland, Oregon.

Funding

ASCEND: ApproacheS to CHC ImplEmeNtation of SDH Data Collection and ActionR18DK114701 · NIDDK · KAISER FOUNDATION RESEARCH INSTITUTE · PI GOLD, RACHEL · 2017 to 2021
$3.5M
NIDDK NIH HHS R18 DK114701
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo assess the extent that patients' social determinants of health (SDOH) influence safety-net primary care clinicians' decisions at the point of care; examine how that information comes to the clinician's attention; and analyze clinician, patient, and encounter characteristics associated with the use of SDOH data in clinical decision making.

methodsThirty-eight clinicians working in 21 clinics were prompted to complete 2 short card surveys embedded in the electronic health record (EHR) daily for 3 weeks. Survey data were matched with clinician-, encounter-, and patient-level variables from the EHR. Descriptive statistics and generalized estimating equation models were used to assess relationships between the variables and the clinician reported use of SDOH data to inform care.

resultsSocial determinants of health were reported to influence care in 35% of surveyed encounters. The most common sources of information on patients' SDOH were conversations with patients (76%), prior knowledge (64%), and the EHR (46%). Social determinants of health were significantly more likely to influence care among male and non-English-speaking patients, and those with discrete SDOH screening data documented in the EHR.

conclusionsElectronic health records present an opportunity to support clinicians integrating information about patients' social and economic circumstances into care planning. Study findings suggest that SDOH information from standardized screening documented in the EHR, combined with patient-clinician conversations, may enable social risk-adjusted care. Electronic health record tools and clinic workflows could be used to support both documentation and conversations. Study results also identified factors that may cue clinicians to include SDOH information in point-of-care decision-making. Future research should explore this topic further.

Indexed as

Community Health CentersElectronic Health RecordsDecision MakingHumansMalePatient Reported Outcome MeasuresPrimary Health CareSocial Determinants of HealthSurveys and Questionnairescard studyelectronic health recordsocial determinants of healthsocial risk factorssurveys and questionaires

Identifiers

PMID36973053
PMCPMC10042556

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.