Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36972968›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2023

Impact of a digital surgical workflow including Digital Device Briefing Tool on morbidity and mortality in a patient population undergoing primary stapled colorectal anastomosis for benign or malignant colorectal disease: protocol for a multicentre prospective cohort study.

Johannes Lauscher, Katharina Beyer, Achim Hellinger, Roland S Croner, Karsten Ridwelski, Christian Krautz, Christine Lim, Paul M Coplan, Marc Kurepkat, Goran Ribaric

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
0.5field-weighted citation impact, top 28% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 8 institutions in 2 countries.

Johannes Lauscher *Department of General and Visceral Surgery, Campus Benjamin Franklin, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
Katharina Beyer *Department of General and Visceral Surgery, Campus Benjamin Franklin, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
Achim HellingerDepartment of General, Visceral, Endocrine and Oncologic Surgery, Klinikum Fulda, Universitätsmedizin Marburg - Campus Fulda, Fulda, Germany.
Roland S CronerDepartment of General, Visceral, Vascular and Transplant Surgery, University Hospital Magdeburg, Otto von Guericke Universität Magdeburg, Magdeburg, Germany.
Karsten RidwelskiAn-Institute of Quality Assurance in Operative Medicine, Otto von Guericke Universität Magdeburg, Magdeburg, Germany.
Christian KrautzDepartment of General and Visceral Surgery, Universitätsklinikum Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg, Erlangen, Germany.
Christine LimJohnson & Johnson MedTech Medical Safety, Johnson & Johnson World Headquarters US, New Brunswick, New Jersey, USA.
Paul M CoplanDepartment of Epidemiology, Office of the Chief Medical Officer, Johnson & Johnson World Headquarters US, New Brunswick, New Jersey, USA.
Marc KurepkatCSG - Clinische Studien Gesellschaft mbH, Berlin, Germany.
Goran RibaricJohnson & Johnson Institute Hamburg, Johnson & Johnson Medical GmbH, Norderstedt, Germany GRibaric@its.jnj.com.ORCID 0000-0002-2292-3004
Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin · DEJohnson & Johnson (United States) · USFriedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg · DEGesellschaft für Klinische Forschung · DEJohnson & Johnson (Germany) · DEKlinikum Fulda · DEKlinikum Magdeburg · DEUniversity Hospital Magdeburg · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionWith growing emphasis on surgical safety, it appears fundamental to assess the safety of colorectal resection involving primary stapled anastomosis. Surgical stapling devices can considerably foster patient safety in colorectal surgery, but their misuse or malfunction encompass a unique risk of postoperative complications. The Digital Device Briefing Tool (DDBT) is a digital cognitive aid developed to enhance safe use of the Ethicon circular stapling device during colorectal resection. The purpose of this study is to evaluate how a digital operative workflow, including DDBT, compared with routine surgical care, affects morbidity and mortality in patients undergoing left-sided colorectal resection with primary stapled colorectal anastomosis for colorectal cancer or benign disease. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: A multicentre, prospective cohort study will be conducted at five certified academic colorectal centres in Germany. It compares a non-digital with a Johnson & Johnson digital solution (Surgical Process Institute Deutschland (SPI))-guided operative workflow in patients undergoing left hemicolectomy, sigmoidectomy, anterior rectal resection and Hartmann reversal procedure. The sample size is set at 528 cases in total, divided into 3 groups (a non-digital and two SPI-guided workflow cohorts, with and without DDBT) in a ratio of 1:1:1, with 176 patients each. The primary endpoint is a composite outcome comprising the overall rate of surgical complications, including death, during hospitalisation and within the first 30 days after colorectal resection. Secondary endpoints include operating time, length of hospital stay and 30-day hospital readmission rate. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: This study will be performed in line with the Declaration of Helsinki. The ethics committee of the Charité-University Medicine Berlin, Germany, approved the study (No: 22-0277-EA2/060/22). Study Investigators will obtain written informed consent from each patient before a patient may participate in this study. The study results will be submitted to an international peer-reviewed journal. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: DRKS00029682.

Indexed as

Colonic DiseasesColorectal NeoplasmsAnastomosis, SurgicalColectomyHumansMorbidityMulticenter Studies as TopicProspective StudiesWorkflowColorectal surgeryHealth & safetyProtocols & guidelines

Identifiers

PMID36972968
PMCPMC10069574
OpenAlexW4361191594

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.