Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36972688›Full record

Observational studyEuropean heart journal2023

Genetic analyses identify brain structures related to cognitive impairment associated with elevated blood pressure.

Mateusz Siedlinski, Lorenzo Carnevale, Xiaoguang Xu, Daniela Carnevale, Evangelos Evangelou, Mark J Caulfield, Pasquale Maffia, Joanna Wardlaw, Nilesh J Samani, Maciej Tomaszewski and 3 more

Abstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in European heart journal, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 38 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
38citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

38 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Genetic analysis of imaging-derived phenotypes.Nature reviews. Genetics · 2026
    Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Controlling blood pressure, preserving cognition: expanding the scope across the life course.Hypertension research : official journal of the Japanese Society of Hypertension · 2025
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Mateusz SiedlinskiDepartment of Internal Medicine, Jagiellonian University Medical College, ul. Skarbowa 1, 31-121 Krakow, Poland.ORCID 0000-0001-7682-6122
Lorenzo CarnevaleDepartment of Angiocardioneurology and Translational Medicine, I.R.C.C.S. INM Neuromed, Via Atinense, 18, 86077 Pozzilli, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-6422-8253
Xiaoguang XuDivision of Cardiovascular Sciences, School of Medical Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, University of Manchester, 46 Grafton Street, Manchester M13 9NT, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-4568-1623
Daniela CarnevaleDepartment of Angiocardioneurology and Translational Medicine, I.R.C.C.S. INM Neuromed, Via Atinense, 18, 86077 Pozzilli, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-5016-3161
Evangelos EvangelouDepartment of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, School of Public Health, Imperial College London, South Kensington Campus, London SW7 2AZ, UK.
Mark J CaulfieldWilliam Harvey Research Institute, NIHR Biomedical Research Centre at Barts, Queen Mary University of London, Charterhouse Square, London EC1M 6BQ, UK.
Pasquale MaffiaSchool of Infection & Immunity, College of Medical, Veterinary and Life Sciences, University of Glasgow, University Avenue, Glasgow G12 8QQ, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-3926-4225
Joanna WardlawCentre for Clinical Brain Sciences, UK Dementia Research Institute, University of Edinburgh, 49 Little France Crescent, Edinburgh EH16 4SB, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-9812-6642
Nilesh J SamaniDepartment of Cardiovascular Sciences, University of Leicester, University Road, Leicester LE1 7RH, UK.
Maciej TomaszewskiDivision of Cardiovascular Sciences, School of Medical Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, University of Manchester, 46 Grafton Street, Manchester M13 9NT, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-8215-6567
Giuseppe LemboDepartment of Angiocardioneurology and Translational Medicine, I.R.C.C.S. INM Neuromed, Via Atinense, 18, 86077 Pozzilli, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-3510-223X
Michael V HolmesBristol Medical School, Population Health Sciences, University of Bristol, Queens Road, Bristol BS8 1QU, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-6617-0879
Tomasz J GuzikDepartment of Internal Medicine, Jagiellonian University Medical College, ul. Skarbowa 1, 31-121 Krakow, Poland.ORCID 0000-0002-5039-7849

Funding

Alzheimer's SocietyBritish Heart Foundation 19/16/34270British Heart Foundation FS/14/49/30838 and FS/4yPhD/F/20/34127A to T.J.GBritish Heart Foundation FS/18/23/33512British Heart Foundation PG/19/84/34771British Heart Foundation PG/19/84/34771, FS/19/56/34893A, PG/21/10541, PG/21/10634British Heart Foundation PG/21/10541British Heart Foundation PG/21/10634British Heart Foundation RE/18/5/34216Department of HealthEuropean Research Council ERC-CoG-726318Medical Research Council G9521010Medical Research Council MC_EX_MR/M009203/1Medical Research Council MC_PC_14089Medical Research Council MR/M009203/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND

aimsObservational studies have linked elevated blood pressure (BP) to impaired cognitive function. However, the functional and structural changes in the brain that mediate the relationship between BP elevation and cognitive impairment remain unknown. Using observational and genetic data from large consortia, this study aimed to identify brain structures potentially associated with BP values and cognitive function. METHODS AND

resultsData on BP were integrated with 3935 brain magnetic resonance imaging-derived phenotypes (IDPs) and cognitive function defined by fluid intelligence score. Observational analyses were performed in the UK Biobank and a prospective validation cohort. Mendelian randomisation (MR) analyses used genetic data derived from the UK Biobank, International Consortium for Blood Pressure, and COGENT consortium. Mendelian randomisation analysis identified a potentially adverse causal effect of higher systolic BP on cognitive function [-0.044 standard deviation (SD); 95% confidence interval (CI) -0.066, -0.021] with the MR estimate strengthening (-0.087 SD; 95% CI -0.132, -0.042), when further adjusted for diastolic BP. Mendelian randomisation analysis found 242, 168, and 68 IDPs showing significant (false discovery rate P < 0.05) association with systolic BP, diastolic BP, and pulse pressure, respectively. Most of these IDPs were inversely associated with cognitive function in observational analysis in the UK Biobank and showed concordant effects in the validation cohort. Mendelian randomisation analysis identified relationships between cognitive function and the nine of the systolic BP-associated IDPs, including the anterior thalamic radiation, anterior corona radiata, or external capsule.

conclusionComplementary MR and observational analyses identify brain structures associated with BP, which may be responsible for the adverse effects of hypertension on cognitive performance.

Indexed as

Cognitive DysfunctionHypertensionBlood PressureBrainGenome-Wide Association StudyHumansMendelian Randomization AnalysisPolymorphism, Single NucleotideBlood pressureBrainCognitive functionGenome-wide association studyHypertensionMendelian randomisation

Identifiers

PMID36972688
PMCPMC10281555

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.