Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36972481›Full record

ArticleClinical and applied thrombosis/hemostasis : official journal of the International Academy of Clinical and Applied Thrombosis/Hemostasis

Perioperative Outcomes of Patients with Bleeding Disorders Undergoing Major Surgery at an Academic Hemophilia Treatment Center.

Ruben Rhoades, Zachary French, Amy Yang, Karen Walsh, Douglass A Drelich, Steven E McKenzie

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical and applied thrombosis/hemostasis : official journal of the International Academy of Clinical and Applied Thrombosis/Hemostasis. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
4.4field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. European Principles of Nursing Care for Persons With Inherited Bleeding Disorders.Haemophilia : the official journal of the World Federation of Hemophilia · 2025
    Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Ruben RhoadesDivision of Hematology, Department of Medicine, Cardeza Foundation for Hematologic Research, 6559Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-9638-0516
Zachary FrenchDivision of Hematology, Department of Medicine, Cardeza Foundation for Hematologic Research, 6559Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Amy YangCollege of Population Health, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Karen WalshCVS Health/Aetna, Blue Bell, PA, USA.
Douglass A DrelichDivision of Hematology, Department of Medicine, Cardeza Foundation for Hematologic Research, 6559Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Steven E McKenzieDivision of Hematology, Department of Medicine, Cardeza Foundation for Hematologic Research, 6559Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Thomas Jefferson University · USAetna (United States) · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Persons with bleeding disorders (PwBD) are at high risk for bleeding with invasive procedures. However, the risk of bleeding in PwBD undergoing major surgery and outcomes of patients managed perioperatively at a hemophilia treatment center (HTC) are not well described. We performed a retrospective review of surgical outcomes among PwBD undergoing major surgery between January 1st, 2017 and December 31st, 2019 at the Cardeza Foundation Hemophilia and Thrombosis Center in Philadelphia, PA. The primary outcome was postoperative bleeding, assessed according to the ISTH-SSC's 2010 definition. Secondary outcomes included use of unplanned postoperative hemostatic therapy, LOS, and 30-day readmission rate. Results were compared to non-PwBD population from a surgical database, matched for surgery, age, and sex. During the study period, 50 PwBD underwent 63 major surgeries. The most common diagnoses were VWD (64%) and hemophilia A (20.0%). The most common surgical procedure category was orthopedic (33.3%), predominantly arthroplasties. Postoperatively,4.8% of procedures were complicated by major bleeding and 1.6% by non-major bleeding. The mean LOS was 1.65 days, and 30-day readmission rate was 1.6%. In comparison to matched, non-PwBD patients in a national surgical database undergoing the same procedures, study patients had a similar rate of bleeding complications per procedure (5.0% vs 1.04%

Indexed as

Hemophilia AHemostaticsvon Willebrand DiseasesHumansPostoperative HemorrhageRetrospective StudiesHemostaticsbleeding disorderhemophiliamajor surgeryperioperative outcomesvon Willebrand disease

Identifiers

PMID36972481
PMCPMC10052468
OpenAlexW4360992736

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.