Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36972335›Full record

ArticleCBE life sciences education2023

Reflective Practices in Education: A Primer for Practitioners.

Haleigh Machost, Marilyne Stains

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in CBE life sciences education, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Reflections on qualitative research: Lessons learned to ensure research integrity.South African family practice : official journal of the South African Academy of Family Practice/Primary Care · 2025
    Article
  8. Narrative medicine in ethics education: from theory to practice.Journal of medical ethics and history of medicine · 2025
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Haleigh MachostDepartment of Chemistry, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, Virginia 22903.
Marilyne StainsDepartment of Chemistry, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, Virginia 22903.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Reflective practices in education are widely advocated for and have become important components of professional reviews. The advantages of reflective practices are many; however, the literature often focuses on the benefits to students, rather than the benefits for the educators themselves. Additionally, the extant literature concerning reflective practices in education is laden with conflicting terminology and complex studies, which can inhibit educators' understanding of reflective practices and prevent their adoption. As such, this

Indexed as

CurriculumStudentsHumansWriting

Identifiers

PMID36972335
PMCPMC10228263

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.