Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36972334›Full record

ArticleCBE life sciences education2023

What a Difference in Pressure Makes! A Framework Describing Undergraduate Students' Reasoning about Bulk Flow Down Pressure Gradients.

Jennifer H Doherty, Emily E Scott, Jack A Cerchiara, Lauren N Jescovitch, Jenny L McFarland, Kevin C Haudek, Mary Pat Wenderoth

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in CBE life sciences education, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Jennifer H DohertyDepartment of Physiology and Lyman Briggs College, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI 48824.ORCID 0000-0002-2333-1692
Emily E ScottDepartment of Biology, University of Washington, Seattle, WA 98195.ORCID 0000-0002-4545-9910
Jack A CerchiaraDepartment of Biology, University of Washington, Seattle, WA 98195.ORCID 0000-0002-3606-7966
Lauren N JescovitchCREATE for STEM Institute, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI 48824.ORCID 0000-0002-8786-1297
Jenny L McFarlandEdmonds College, Lynnwood, WA 98036.ORCID 0000-0002-5500-3079
Kevin C HaudekCREATE for STEM Institute, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI 48824.ORCID 0000-0003-1422-6038
Mary Pat WenderothDepartment of Biology, University of Washington, Seattle, WA 98195.ORCID 0000-0003-1036-5460

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Pressure gradients serve as the key driving force for the bulk flow of fluids in biology (e.g., blood, air, phloem sap). However, students often struggle to understand the mechanism that causes these fluids to flow. To investigate student reasoning about bulk flow, we collected students' written responses to assessment items and interviewed students about their bulk flow ideas. From these data, we constructed a bulk flow pressure gradient reasoning framework that describes the different patterns in reasoning that students express about what causes fluids to flow and ordered those patterns into sequential levels from more informal ways of reasoning to more scientific, mechanistic ways of reasoning. We obtained validity evidence for this bulk flow pressure gradient reasoning framework by collecting and analyzing written responses from a national sample of undergraduate biology and allied health majors from 11 courses at five institutions. Instructors can use the bulk flow pressure gradient reasoning framework and assessment items to inform their instruction of this topic and formatively assess their students' progress toward more scientific, mechanistic ways of reasoning about this important physiological concept.

Indexed as

Problem SolvingStudentsHumansWriting

Identifiers

PMID36972334
PMCPMC10228264

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.