Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36972236›Full record

ArticlePloS one2023

An evaluation of LLIN ownership, access, and use during the Magude project in southern Mozambique.

Lucia Fernández Montoya, Celso Alafo, Helena Martí-Soler, Mara Máquina, Arlindo Malheia, Charfudin Sacoor, Ana Paula Abílio, Dulcisaria Marrenjo, Nelson Cuamba, Beatriz Galatas and 3 more

Open access · goldFull text read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
5.0field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.

Lucia Fernández MontoyaCentro de Investigação em Saúde de Manhiça (CISM), Fundação Manhiça, Manhiça Maputo, Mozambique.ORCID 0000-0001-6764-6592
Celso AlafoCentro de Investigação em Saúde de Manhiça (CISM), Fundação Manhiça, Manhiça Maputo, Mozambique.
Helena Martí-SolerISGlobal, Barcelona, Spain.
Mara MáquinaCentro de Investigação em Saúde de Manhiça (CISM), Fundação Manhiça, Manhiça Maputo, Mozambique.
Arlindo MalheiaCentro de Investigação em Saúde de Manhiça (CISM), Fundação Manhiça, Manhiça Maputo, Mozambique.
Charfudin SacoorCentro de Investigação em Saúde de Manhiça (CISM), Fundação Manhiça, Manhiça Maputo, Mozambique.
Ana Paula AbílioInstituto Nacional da Saúde, Ministério da Saúde, Maputo, Mozambique.
Dulcisaria MarrenjoPrograma Nacional de Controlo da Malária, Ministério da Saúde, Maputo, Mozambique.
Nelson CuambaPrograma Nacional de Controlo da Malária, Ministério da Saúde, Maputo, Mozambique.
Beatriz GalatasCentro de Investigação em Saúde de Manhiça (CISM), Fundação Manhiça, Manhiça Maputo, Mozambique.
Pedro AideCentro de Investigação em Saúde de Manhiça (CISM), Fundação Manhiça, Manhiça Maputo, Mozambique.
Francisco SaúteCentro de Investigação em Saúde de Manhiça (CISM), Fundação Manhiça, Manhiça Maputo, Mozambique.
Krijn P PaaijmansCentro de Investigação em Saúde de Manhiça (CISM), Fundação Manhiça, Manhiça Maputo, Mozambique.ORCID 0000-0003-4837-2818
Manhiça Health Research Centre · MZInstituto Nacional de Saúde · MZBarcelona Institute for Global Health · ES

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The Magude Project assessed the feasibly of eliminating malaria in a low transmission setting in southern Mozambique using a package of interventions. This study measured the ownership, access and use of long-lasting insecticide treated nets (LLINs) and inequalities in these indicators across household wealth, size and population subgroups, to understand the protection that LLINs provided during the project. Data were obtained from various household surveys. At least 31% of the nets distributed during the 2014 and 2017 campaigns were lost during the first year post-distribution. Most nets (77.1%) present in the district were Olyset Nets. LLIN access never exceeded 76.3% and use varied seasonally between 40% and 76.4%. LLIN access limited LLIN use during the project, especially during the high transmission season. LLIN ownership, access and use were lower in harder-to-reach localities, in poorer and larger households. Children and women below 30 had poorer access to LLINs than the overall population. Net use was lowest among school-aged children and young adults, especially among young males, and highest in children under 5, pregnant women, in older adults and in households that received indoor residual spraying (IRS). This study revealed that LLIN mass-distribution campaigns alone are not sufficient to achieve the high level of net protection needed during elimination programs and that reviewing the LLIN allocation scheme, top-up distributions and/or community engagement campaigns is needed, also to reduce inequalities in populations' access to LLINs.

Indexed as

Insecticide-Treated BednetsOwnershipAgedChildCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansMaleMosquito ControlMozambiquePregnancyReceptor Protein-Tyrosine KinasesYoung AdultReceptor Protein-Tyrosine Kinases

Identifiers

PMID36972236
PMCPMC10042371
OpenAlexW4361017285

What OpenQuestion holds

Textfull text, public
LicenceCC BY
measurements read147
identifiers read9
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.