Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36972219›Full record

Trial reportThe journal of spinal cord medicine2023

Clinical trial of home blood pressure monitoring following midodrine administration in hypotensive individuals with spinal cord injury.

Jill M Wecht, Joseph P Weir, Caitlyn G Katzelnick, Trevor A Dyson-Hudson, William A Bauman, Steven C Kirshblum

Open access · greenAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in The journal of spinal cord medicine, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.9field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Jill M WechtJames J Peters VA Medical Center, Bronx, NY, USA.
Joseph P WeirDepartment of Health, Sport, and Exercise Sciences, University of Kansas, Lawrence, KS, USA.
Caitlyn G KatzelnickJames J Peters VA Medical Center, Bronx, NY, USA.
Trevor A Dyson-HudsonKessler Foundation, West Orange, NJ, USA.
William A BaumanJames J Peters VA Medical Center, Bronx, NY, USA.
Steven C KirshblumKessler Foundation, West Orange, NJ, USA.
Rutgers New Jersey Medical SchoolIcahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai · USJames J. Peters VA Medical Center · USKessler Foundation · USUniversity of Kansas · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIndividuals with spinal cord injury (SCI) above thoracic level-6 (T6) experience impaired descending cortical control of the autonomic nervous system which predisposes them to blood pressure (BP) instability, including includes hypotension, orthostatic hypotension (OH), and autonomic dysreflexia (AD). However, many individuals do not report symptoms of these BP disorders, and because there are few treatment options that have been proven safe and effective for use in the SCI population, most individuals remain untreated.

objectiveThe primary aim of this investigation was to determine the effects of midodrine (10 mg) prescribed TID or BID in the home environment, compared to placebo, on 30-day BP, study withdrawals, and symptom reporting associated with OH and AD in hypotensive individuals with SCI. DESIGN/

methodsParticipants were randomly assigned to received midodrine/placebo or placebo/midodrine, with a 2-weeks washout period in between, and both the participants and investigators were blinded to randomization order. Study medication was taken 2 or 3 times/day, depending on their sleep/wake schedule, BP, and any related symptoms were recorded before and 1 h after each dosage and periodically throughout the day.

resultsNineteen individuals with SCI were recruited; however, 9 withdrew prior to completion of the full protocol. A total of 1892 BP recordings (75 ± 48 recordings/participant/30-day period) were collected in the 19 participants over the two 30-day monitoring periods. Average 30-day systolic BP was significantly increased with midodrine compared to placebo (114 ± 14 vs. 96 ± 11 mmHg, respectively;

conclusionMidodrine (10 mg) administered in the home environment effectively increases BP and reduces the incidence of hypotension; however these beneficial effects come at the expense of worsened BP instability and AD symptom intensity.

Indexed as

Autonomic DysreflexiaHypotensionHypotension, OrthostaticMidodrineSpinal Cord InjuriesBlood Pressure Monitoring, AmbulatoryHumansMidodrineAutonomic dysreflexiaHemodynamic instabilityHypotensionOrthostatic hypotensionParaplegiaSpinal cord injuriesTetraplegia

Identifiers

PMID36972219
PMCPMC10274547
OpenAlexW4361017367

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.