Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36972117›Full record

ArticleJMIR research protocols2023

Ohnut Versus a Waitlist Control for the Self-management of Endometriosis-Associated Deep Dyspareunia: Protocol for a Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial.

Sandy X J Zhang, Rebecca G K MacLeod, Gurkiran Parmar, Natasha L Orr, Kate J Wahl, Heather Noga, Arianne Albert, Ryan Flannigan, Lori A Brotto, Paul J Yong

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JMIR research protocols, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04370444 (Pathways for Patient-centered Diagnosis and Management of Endometriosis-associated Deep Dyspareunia), which is not on this map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04370444 nacompletednot on this map

Pathways for Patient-centered Diagnosis and Management of Endometriosis-associated Deep Dyspareunia: A Pilot Randomized Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorBC Women's Hospital & Health CentreRan2021 to 2021Enrolled30ConditionsEndometriosis-related Pain, Dyspareunia DeepArmsPhallus Length Reducer, Self-assessment of dyspareunia
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Sandy X J ZhangDepartment of Obstetrics & Gynaecology, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9605-4585
Rebecca G K MacLeodDepartment of Obstetrics & Gynaecology, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0248-0514
Gurkiran ParmarDepartment of Obstetrics & Gynaecology, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9033-1011
Natasha L OrrDepartment of Obstetrics & Gynaecology, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7413-9369
Kate J WahlDepartment of Obstetrics & Gynaecology, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7921-6191
Heather NogaWomen's Health Research Institute, British Columbia Women's Hospital & Health Centre, Vancouver, BC, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3565-6072
Arianne AlbertWomen's Health Research Institute, British Columbia Women's Hospital & Health Centre, Vancouver, BC, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3050-0888
Ryan FlanniganDepartment of Urology, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6964-7521
Lori A BrottoDepartment of Obstetrics & Gynaecology, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7552-8588
Paul J YongDepartment of Obstetrics & Gynaecology, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5521-3052
University of British Columbia · CAWomen's Health Research Institute · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundEndometriosis-associated deep dyspareunia is associated with reduced sexual quality of life, lower self-esteem, and impaired sexual function.

objectiveThe primary objective is to assess the acceptability of a phallus length reducer (brand name: Ohnut [OhnutCo]), which is a buffer worn over the penis or a penetrating object to reduce endometriosis-associated deep dyspareunia, and the feasibility of a definitive randomized controlled trial (RCT). The secondary objective is to obtain estimates of the effectiveness of the buffer. An embedded substudy will explore the acceptability and the preliminary validity and reliability of a vaginal insert for the self-assessment of deep dyspareunia.

methodsOurs is an investigator-initiated, 2-arm RCT. We will recruit 40 patient participants with diagnosed endometriosis between the ages of 19 and 49 years, as well as their sexual partners. The participating couples will be randomized in a 1:1 ratio into the experimental arm or the waitlist control arm. The length of the study period will be 10 weeks, during which time all participants will record deep dyspareunia severity following each episode of sexual intercourse. In weeks 1 to 4, all patient participants will record deep dyspareunia severity at each sexual encounter. In weeks 5 to 10, participants in the experimental arm will use the buffer during vaginal penetration; participants in the waitlist control arm will continue engaging in vaginal penetration as usual. Participants will complete questionnaires for assessing measures of anxiety, depression, and sexual function at baseline, at 4 weeks, and at 10 weeks. In the substudy, patient participants will self-assess dyspareunia by using a vaginal insert on 2 occasions, at least 1 week apart. The primary outcomes-the acceptability and feasibility of the buffer-will be assessed with descriptive statistics, and the secondary outcome-phallus length reducer effectiveness-will be assessed by using an analysis of covariance-based approach. For the vaginal insert, we will assess acceptability, test-retest reliability, and convergent validity via correlation analyses comparing the use of the insert to clinical examination in terms of dyspareunia assessment outcomes.

resultsOur pilot will provide initial data on the acceptability and effectiveness of the buffer and the feasibility of the study methodology. The results from our study are expected to be submitted for publication by the spring of 2023. As of September 2021, we have consented 31 couples into the study.

conclusionsOur study will provide preliminary evidence for the self-assessment and management of endometriosis-associated deep dyspareunia. The findings will inform the decision to proceed to a definitive RCT.

trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov NCT04370444; https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT04370444. INTERNATIONAL REGISTERED REPORT IDENTIFIER (IRRID): DERR1-10.2196/39834.

Indexed as

dyspareuniaendometriosisgynecologistgynecologypainpilot projectpilot studyrandomized controlled trialself-managementsexual healthsexual medicinewomen's health

Identifiers

PMID36972117
PMCPMC10131731
OpenAlexW4317927826

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.