Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36972008›Full record

ArticleClinical pharmacokinetics2023

Optimization of β-Lactam Dosing Regimens in Neonatal Infections: Continuous and Extended Administration versus Intermittent Administration.

Emiel Leegwater, Leo Wewerinke, Anne M de Grauw, Mirjam van Veen, Bert N Storm, Matthijs D Kruizinga

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical pharmacokinetics, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
2.7field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Effect of β-lactam antibiotics on the gut microbiota of term neonates.Annals of clinical microbiology and antimicrobials · 2024
    Article
  8. Review
  9. [Clinical practice guidelines for meropenem therapy in neonatal sepsis (2024)].Zhongguo dang dai er ke za zhi = Chinese journal of contemporary pediatrics · 2024
    Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Emiel LeegwaterThe Hague Hospital Pharmacy, The Hague, The Netherlands. e.leegwater@hagaziekenhuis.nl.ORCID 0000-0001-5062-977X
Leo WewerinkeJuliana Children's Hospital, Haga Teaching Hospital, The Hague, The Netherlands.
Anne M de GrauwJuliana Children's Hospital, Haga Teaching Hospital, The Hague, The Netherlands.
Mirjam van VeenJuliana Children's Hospital, Haga Teaching Hospital, The Hague, The Netherlands.
Bert N StormDepartment of Hospital Pharmacy, Haga Teaching Hospital, The Hague, The Netherlands.
Matthijs D KruizingaJuliana Children's Hospital, Haga Teaching Hospital, The Hague, The Netherlands.
Haga Hospital · NLLeiden University · NLLeiden University Medical Center · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND

objectiveIn neonates, β-Lactam antibiotics are almost exclusively administered by intermittent infusion. However, continuous or prolonged infusion may be more beneficial because of the time-dependent antibacterial activity. In this pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic simulation study, we aimed to compare treatment with continuous, extended and intermittent infusion of β-lactam antibiotics for neonates with infectious diseases.

methodsWe selected population pharmacokinetic models of penicillin G, amoxicillin, flucloxacillin, cefotaxime, ceftazidime and meropenem, and performed a Monte Carlo simulation with 30,000 neonates. Four different dosing regimens were simulated: intermittent infusion in 30 min, prolonged infusion in 4 h, continuous infusion, and continuous infusion with a loading dose. The primary endpoint was 90% probability of target attainment (PTA) for 100% ƒT>MIC during the first 48 h of treatment.

resultsFor all antibiotics except cefotaxime, continuous infusion with a loading dose resulted in a higher PTA compared with other dosing regimens. Sufficient exposure (PTA >90%) using continuous infusion with a loading dose was reached for amoxicillin (90.3%), penicillin G (PTA 98.4%), flucloxacillin (PTA 94.3%), cefotaxime (PTA 100%), and ceftazidime (PTA 100%). Independent of dosing regimen, higher meropenem (PTA for continuous infusion with a loading dose of 85.5%) doses might be needed to treat severe infections in neonates. Ceftazidime and cefotaxime dose might be unnecessarily high, as even with dose reductions, a PTA > 90% was retained.

conclusionsContinuous infusion after a loading dose leads to a higher PTA compared with continuous, intermittent or prolonged infusion, and therefore has the potential to improve treatment with β-lactam antibiotics in neonates.

Indexed as

Communicable DiseasesFloxacillinAmoxicillinAnti-Bacterial AgentsCefotaximeCeftazidimeHumansInfant, NewbornInfusions, IntravenousMeropenemMicrobial Sensitivity TestsMonobactamsMonte Carlo MethodAmoxicillinAnti-Bacterial AgentsCefotaximeCeftazidimeFloxacillinMeropenemMonobactams

Identifiers

PMID36972008
OpenAlexW4361017269

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.