Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36971912›Full record

ArticleLangenbeck's archives of surgery2023

Completely 3-dimensional laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy with modified Blumgart pancreaticojejunostomy: an analysis of 100 consecutive cases.

Liu Wensheg, Ji Shunrong, Xu Wenyan, Shi Yihua, Liu Mengqi, Li Zheng, Zhuo Qifeng, Xu Xiaowu, Yu Xianjun

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Langenbeck's archives of surgery, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Liu WenshegDepartment of Pancreatic Surgery, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, 270 Dongan Road, Shanghai, 201321200032, China. liuwensheng@fudanpci.org.
Ji ShunrongDepartment of Pancreatic Surgery, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, 270 Dongan Road, Shanghai, 201321200032, China.
Xu WenyanDepartment of Pancreatic Surgery, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, 270 Dongan Road, Shanghai, 201321200032, China.
Shi YihuaDepartment of Pancreatic Surgery, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, 270 Dongan Road, Shanghai, 201321200032, China.
Liu MengqiDepartment of Pancreatic Surgery, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, 270 Dongan Road, Shanghai, 201321200032, China.
Li ZhengDepartment of Pancreatic Surgery, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, 270 Dongan Road, Shanghai, 201321200032, China.
Zhuo QifengDepartment of Pancreatic Surgery, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, 270 Dongan Road, Shanghai, 201321200032, China. zhuoqifeng@fudanpci.org.
Xu XiaowuDepartment of Pancreatic Surgery, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, 270 Dongan Road, Shanghai, 201321200032, China. xuxiaowu@fudanpci.org.
Yu XianjunDepartment of Pancreatic Surgery, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, 270 Dongan Road, Shanghai, 201321200032, China. yuxianjun@fudanpci.org.

Funding

National Natural Science Foundation of China 81702871National Natural Science Foundation of China 81871950National Natural Science Foundation of China 81972725National Natural Science Foundation of China 82141129National Natural Science Foundation of China 82172577National Natural Science Foundation of China 82172948National Natural Science Foundation of China 82173281National Natural Science Foundation of China 82173282
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeAlthough laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy (LPD) is increasingly performed in high-volume centers, pancreaticojejunostomy (PJ) is still the most challenging procedure. Pancreatic anastomotic leakage remains a major complication after PD. Thus, various technical modifications regarding PJ, such as the Blumgart technique, have been attempted to simplify the procedure and minimize anastomotic leakage. Three-dimensional (3D) laparoscopic systems have been shown to be particularly helpful in performing difficult and precise tasks. We present a modified Blumgart anastomosis in 3D-LPD and investigate its clinical outcomes.

methodsA retrospective analysis of 100 patients who underwent 3D-LPD with modified Blumgart PJ from September 2018 to January 2020 was conducted. Data on the preoperative characteristics, operative outcomes, and postoperative characteristics of the patients were collected and analyzed.

resultsThe mean operative time and duration of PJ were 348.2 and 25.1 min, respectively. The mean estimated blood loss was 112 mL. The overall rate of postoperative complications over Clavien‒Dindo classification III was 18%. The incidence of clinically relevant postoperative pancreatic fistula was 11%. The median postoperative hospital stay was 14.2 days. Only one patient required reoperation (1%), and no patient died in the hospital or 90 days after the operation. High BMI, small main pancreatic duct diameter, and soft pancreatic consistency had a significant influence on the occurrence of CR-POPF.

conclusionsThe surgical outcome of 3D-LPD with modified Blumgart PJ seems to be comparable to other studies in terms of operation time, blood loss, hospital stay, and complication incidence. We consider the modified Blumgart technique in 3D-LPD to be novel, reliable, safe, and favorable for PJ in the PD procedure.

Indexed as

LaparoscopyPancreaticojejunostomyAnastomosis, SurgicalAnastomotic LeakHumansPancreatic FistulaPancreaticoduodenectomyPostoperative ComplicationsRetrospective Studies3-Dimensional laparoscopic systemsLaparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomyModified Blumgart anastomosisPancreatic fistulaPancreaticojejunostomy

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.