Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36971849›Full record

ArticleTechniques in coloproctology2023

Single-incision robotic colorectal surgery with the da Vinci SP® surgical system: initial results of 50 cases.

H S Kim, B-Y Oh, C Cheong, M H Park, S S Chung, R-A Lee, K H Kim, G T Noh

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Techniques in coloproctology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
7.0field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 22 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Application of the Da Vinci Single-Port (SP) Robot in General Surgery: A First Systematic Review.The international journal of medical robotics + computer assisted surgery : MRCAS · 2025
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Robot-Assisted Colectomy for Left-Sided Colon Cancer: Comparison of da Vinci SP and Single-Site Platforms.The international journal of medical robotics + computer assisted surgery : MRCAS · 2025
    Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

H S KimDepartment of Surgery, Ewha Womans University College of Medicine, 260, Gonghang-Daero, Gangseo-Gu, Seoul, 07804, South Korea.
B-Y OhDepartment of Surgery, Hallym University Sacred Heart Hospital, Hallym University College of Medicine, Anyang, South Korea.
C CheongDepartment of Surgery, Korea University Guro Hospital, Korea University College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea.
M H ParkEwha Womans University Seoul Hospital, Seoul, South Korea.
S S ChungDepartment of Surgery, Ewha Womans University College of Medicine, 260, Gonghang-Daero, Gangseo-Gu, Seoul, 07804, South Korea.
R-A LeeDepartment of Surgery, Ewha Womans University College of Medicine, 260, Gonghang-Daero, Gangseo-Gu, Seoul, 07804, South Korea.
K H KimDepartment of Surgery, Ewha Womans University College of Medicine, 260, Gonghang-Daero, Gangseo-Gu, Seoul, 07804, South Korea.
G T NohDepartment of Surgery, Ewha Womans University College of Medicine, 260, Gonghang-Daero, Gangseo-Gu, Seoul, 07804, South Korea. gtnohlive@gmail.com.ORCID 0000-0001-9849-8211
Ewha Womans University · KRHallym University Sacred Heart Hospital · KRKorea University Medical Center · KR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThe da Vinci SP® (dVSP) surgical system (Intuitive Surgical, Sunnyvale, CA, USA), a robotic platform designed for single-incision surgery, overcame the need for multiple ports in traditional robotic surgery and issues including triangulation and retraction in single-incision laparoscopic surgery. However, previous studies only included case reports or series with small sample sizes. The aim of this study was to assess the safety and performance of the dVSP surgical system and its instruments and accessories for colorectal procedures.

methodsThe medical records of patients who had surgery with the dVSP from March 2019 to September 2021 at Ewha Womans University Seoul Hospital were investigated. The pathologic and follow-up data of patients who had malignant tumors were analyzed separately to evaluate oncological safety.

resultsFifty patients (26 male and 24 female) with a median age of 59 years (interquartile range 52.5-63.0 years) were enrolled. The procedures included low anterior resection with total mesorectal excision (n = 16), sigmoid colectomy with complete mesocolic excision and central vessel ligation (CME + CVL) (n = 14), right colectomy with CME + CVL (n = 9), left colectomy with CME + CVL (n = 4), right colectomy (n = 6), and sigmoid colectomy (n = 1). Operative time significantly decreased after 25 cases (early phase vs. late phase; operative time 295.0 min vs. 250.0 min, p = 0.015; docking time 16.0 min vs. 12.0 min, p = 0.001; console time 212.0 min vs. 190.0 min, p = 0.019). Planned procedures were successfully completed in all patients. Postoperative outcomes were acceptable with only six cases of mild adverse events through a 3-month follow-up. No local recurrence and only one case of systemic recurrence occurred within 1 year postoperatively.

conclusionsThis study demonstrated the surgical and oncological safety and feasibility of dVSP, which may be a novel surgical platform for colorectal surgery.

Indexed as

Colorectal SurgeryLaparoscopyRoboticsRobotic Surgical ProceduresColectomyFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedOperative TimeRetrospective StudiesColorectal surgeryDa Vinci SPRobotic surgerySingle-incision

Identifiers

PMID36971849
OpenAlexW4361000592

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.