ArticleActa neurochirurgica2023
Long-term outcomes after traumatic brain injury in elderly patients on antithrombotic therapy.
Article in Acta neurochirurgica, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 16 citations in OpenAlex.
- Outcomes following traumatic brain injury in patients with Pre-Injury antiplatelets versus anticoagulants: A systematic review and Meta-Analysis.Neurosurgical review · 2025Pooled it
- Short-term impact of preinjury antithrombotic therapy on outcomes in older trauma patients.European journal of trauma and emergency surgery : official publication of the European Trauma Society · 2026Article
- Prognostic Significance of Preoperative Neurological Versus Radiological Deterioration in Older Patients with Moderate-to-Mild Traumatic Brain Injury.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Quantitative evaluation of early antifibrinolytic therapy on 90-day mortality in elderly patients with acute traumatic subdural hematoma: insights from a prospective cohort study.Acta neurologica Belgica · 2025Article
- Diagnostic performance of S100B assay for intracranial hemorrhage detection in patients with mild traumatic brain injury under antiplatelet or anticoagulant therapy.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Unraveling the complexity of acute subdural hematoma in elderly patients: The impact of anticoagulant therapy and the pursuit of better outcomes.Ulusal travma ve acil cerrahi dergisi = Turkish journal of trauma & emergency surgery : TJTES · 2025Article
- Effect of prior anticoagulation therapy on outcomes of traumatic brain injury: A systematic review and meta‑analysis.Experimental and therapeutic medicine · 2024Article
- Comparative Analysis of Antithrombotic Therapy Outcomes in Mild Traumatic Brain-Injury Patients: A Focus on Bleeding Risk and Hospital-Stay Duration.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Clinical complications after a traumatic brain injury and its relation with brain biomarkers.Scientific reports · 2023Article
- Seeking a fine balance between effective antithrombotic prophylaxis and safety drug profile in the elderly population: the special case of traumatic brain injury.Acta neurochirurgica · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionElderly patients receiving antithrombotic treatment have a significantly higher risk of developing an intracranial hemorrhage when suffering traumatic brain injury (TBI), potentially contributing to higher mortality rates and worse functional outcomes. It is unclear whether different antithrombotic drugs carry a similar risk.
objectiveThis study aims to investigate injury patterns and long-term outcomes after TBI in elderly patients treated with antithrombotic drugs.
methodsThe clinical records of 2999 patients ≥ 65 years old admitted to the University Hospitals Leuven (Belgium) between 1999 and 2019 with a diagnosis of TBI, spanning all injury severities, were manually screened.
resultsA total of 1443 patients who had not experienced a cerebrovascular accident prior to TBI nor presented with a chronic subdural hematoma at admission were included in the analysis. Relevant clinical information, including medication use and coagulation lab tests, was manually registered and statistically analyzed using Python and R. In the overall cohort, 418 (29.0%) of the patients were treated with acetylsalicylic acid before TBI, 58 (4.0%) with vitamin K antagonists (VKA), 14 (1.0%) with a different antithrombotic drug, and 953 (66.0%) did not receive any antithrombotic treatment. The median age was 81 years (IQR = 11). The most common cause of TBI was a fall accident (79.4% of the cases), and 35.7% of the cases were classified as mild TBI. Patients treated with vitamin K antagonists had the highest rate of subdural hematomas (44.8%) (p = 0.02), hospitalization (98.3%, p = 0.03), intensive care unit admissions (41.4%, p < 0.01), and mortality within 30 days post-TBI (22.4%, p < 0.01). The number of patients treated with adenosine diphosphate (ADP) receptor antagonists and direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) was too low to draw conclusions about the risks associated with these antithrombotic drugs.
conclusionIn a large cohort of elderly patients, treatment with VKA prior to TBI was associated with a higher rate of acute subdural hematoma and a worse outcome, compared with other patients. However, intake of low dose aspirin prior to TBI did not have such effects. Therefore, the choice of antithrombotic treatment in elderly patients is of utmost importance with respect to risks associated with TBI, and patients should be counselled accordingly. Future studies will determine whether the shift towards DOACs is mitigating the poor outcomes associated with VKA after TBI.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.