ReviewACS applied bio materials2024
Computational Design of Peptides for Biomaterials Applications.
Review in ACS applied bio materials, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- Nanomaterials for In Vivo Photoacoustic Sensing: Emerging Strategies and Future Outlook.ACS sensors · 2026Review
- Validation ofACS central science · 2026Article
- Bioactive peptides targeting dyslipidemia and atherosclerosis: from computational discovery and data bottlenecks to precision medicine translation.Frontiers in molecular biosciences · 2026Review
- Recent Advances in Antimicrobial Proteins and Peptides: A Promising Clinical Breakthrough and Patent Landscape.Current protein & peptide science · 2026Review
- Molecular Modelling in Bioactive Peptide Discovery and Characterisation.Biomolecules · 2025Review
- Recent Advances in Antifreeze Peptide Preparation: A Review.Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Review
- Perspectives in Searching Antimicrobial Peptides (AMPs) Produced by the Microbiota.Microbial ecology · 2023Review
- Molecular mechanisms of catch bonds and their implications for platelet hemostasis.Biophysical reviews · 2023Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Computer-aided molecular design and protein engineering emerge as promising and active subjects in bioengineering and biotechnological applications. On one hand, due to the advancing computing power in the past decade, modeling toolkits and force fields have been put to use for accurate multiscale modeling of biomolecules including lipid, protein, carbohydrate, and nucleic acids. On the other hand, machine learning emerges as a revolutionary data analysis tool that promises to leverage physicochemical properties and structural information obtained from modeling in order to build quantitative protein structure-function relationships. We review recent computational works that utilize state-of-the-art computational methods to engineer peptides and proteins for various emerging biomedical, antimicrobial, and antifreeze applications. We also discuss challenges and possible future directions toward developing a roadmap for efficient biomolecular design and engineering.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.