Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36971721›Full record

ArticleJournal of studies on alcohol and drugs2023

Adolescent and Young Adult Response to Hypothetical E-Liquid Flavor Restrictions.

Natasha K Sidhu, William V Lechner, Sam N Cwalina, Lauren Whitted, Sabrina L Smiley, Jessica L Barrington-Trimis, Junhan Cho, Theodore L Wagener, Adam M Leventhal, Alayna P Tackett

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of studies on alcohol and drugs, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Natasha K SidhuDepartment of Psychological Sciences, Kent State University, Kent, Ohio.
William V LechnerDepartment of Psychological Sciences, Kent State University, Kent, Ohio.
Sam N CwalinaDepartment of Preventive Medicine, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California.
Lauren WhittedDepartment of Preventive Medicine, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California.
Sabrina L SmileyDivision of Health Promotion and Behavioral Science, San Diego State University, San Diego, California.
Jessica L Barrington-TrimisDepartment of Preventive Medicine, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California.
Junhan ChoDepartment of Preventive Medicine, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California.
Theodore L WagenerDivision of Medical Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, Ohio.
Adam M LeventhalDepartment of Preventive Medicine, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California.
Alayna P TackettDepartment of Preventive Medicine, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California.

Funding

USC Tobacco Center of Regulatory ScienceU54CA180905 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA · PI Raina Pang · 2018 to 2026
$39.0M
Vaping Nicotine and Cannabis Across Adolescence and Young AdulthoodR01CA229617 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA · PI BARRINGTON-TRIMIS, JESSICA LOUISE, LEVENTHAL, ADAM MATTHEW · 2019 to 2024
$4.3M
Respiratory effects of E-Cigarette use among Youth: A prospective, longitudinal investigationK01HL148907 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA · PI TACKETT, ALAYNA PAULINE · 2019 to 2023
$981k
NCI NIH HHS R01 CA229617NCI NIH HHS U54 CA180905NHLBI NIH HHS K01 HL148907
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveRates of e-cigarette use among adolescents and young adults (AYAs) remain high despite several federal policy changes intended to limit their availability and appeal. The current study examined how restricting flavors would affect current AYA users' intentions to discontinue vaping, as a function of their current flavor preference.

methodIn a national cross-sectional survey, AYA e-cigarette users (

resultsOverall, 38.8% of the sample reported intent to discontinue using their e-cigarette if tobacco and menthol-flavored e-liquid were the only options available, whereas 70.8% would discontinue under a tobacco-only product standard. AYAs preferring fruit/sweet flavor were most sensitive to either restricted scenario, with odds of discontinuing use ranging from adjusted odds ratio (aOR) = 2.22 to aOR = 2.38 under a tobacco and menthol product standard and aOR = 1.33 to aOR = 2.59 under a tobacco-only product standard, compared with other flavor preferences. In addition, AYAs using cooling flavors (e.g., fruit ice) reported higher odds of discontinuing use under a tobacco-only product standard, compared with menthol flavor users, indicating an important distinction between these groups.

conclusionsResults indicate potential for flavor restrictions to reduce use of e-cigarettes among AYAs and suggest that a tobacco flavor product standard may result in the greatest discontinuation of use.

Indexed as

Electronic Nicotine Delivery SystemsTobacco ProductsAdolescentCross-Sectional StudiesHumansIceMentholYoung AdultIceMenthol

Identifiers

PMID36971721
PMCPMC10171255

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.