Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36971677›Full record

Observational studyTranslational vision science & technology2023

Variation in Retinal Nerve Fiber Layer and Ganglion Cell Complex Associated With Optic Nerve Head Size in Healthy Eyes.

Caixia Li, Yanyan Cheng, Ye Zhang, Xiaohua Pan, Hui Feng, Fei Xiang, Meijuan Zhang, Qianqian Ji, Zhi Li, Na Jiang and 2 more

Open access · goldAbstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in Translational vision science & technology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 25% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Caixia LiSchool of Clinical Medicine, Dali University, Dali, China.
Yanyan ChengHebei Eye Hospital, Hebei Provincial Key Laboratory of Ophthalmology, Hebei Provincial Clinical Research Center for Eye Diseases, Xingtai, China.
Ye ZhangBeijing Tongren Eye Center, Beijing Tongren Hospital, Beijing Ophthalmology & Visual Sciences Key Laboratory, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.
Xiaohua PanShenzhen Eye Hospital, Jinan University, Shenzhen Eye Institute, Shenzhen, China.
Hui FengBeijing Tongren Eye Center, Beijing Tongren Hospital, Beijing Ophthalmology & Visual Sciences Key Laboratory, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.
Fei XiangBeijing Tongren Eye Center, Beijing Tongren Hospital, Beijing Ophthalmology & Visual Sciences Key Laboratory, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.
Meijuan ZhangBeijing Tongren Eye Center, Beijing Tongren Hospital, Beijing Ophthalmology & Visual Sciences Key Laboratory, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.
Qianqian JiBeijing Tongren Eye Center, Beijing Tongren Hospital, Beijing Ophthalmology & Visual Sciences Key Laboratory, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.
Zhi LiBeijing Tongren Eye Center, Beijing Tongren Hospital, Beijing Ophthalmology & Visual Sciences Key Laboratory, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.
Na JiangBeijing Tongren Eye Center, Beijing Tongren Hospital, Beijing Ophthalmology & Visual Sciences Key Laboratory, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.
Qing ZhangBeijing Institute of Ophthalmology, Beijing Tongren Hospital, Capital University of Medical Science, Beijing Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences Key Laboratory, Beijing, China.
Shuning LiBeijing Tongren Eye Center, Beijing Tongren Hospital, Beijing Ophthalmology & Visual Sciences Key Laboratory, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.
Beijing Tongren Hospital · CNDali University · CNHebei Eye Hospital · CNJinan University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose: To investigate whether the retinal nerve fiber layer (RNFL) and ganglion cell complex (GCC) change with optic nerve head (ONH) size in healthy eyes. Methods: This cross-sectional observational study recruited participants aged ≥50 years. Participants underwent optical coherence tomography-assisted measurements of the peripapillary RNFL and macular GCC and were divided into small, medium, and large ONH groups according to optic disc area (≤1.9 mm2, >1.9 mm2 and ≤2.4 mm2, and >2.4 mm2, respectively). The groups were compared for RNFL and GCC. Linear regression models were used to evaluate the correlation of RNFL and GCC with ocular and systemic factors. Results: There were 366 participants. The whole, temporal, and superior RNFLs were significantly different among the groups (P = 0.035, 0.034, and 0.013, respectively) with no significant difference in the nasal and inferior RNFL (P = 0.214, 0.267, respectively). The average, superior, and inferior GCCs were not significantly different among the groups (P = 0.583, 0.467, and 0.820, respectively). Thinner RNFL was independently associated with older age (P = 0.003), male sex (P = 0.018), smaller disc area (P < 0.001), higher vertical cup disc ratio (VCDR) (P < 0.001), and larger maximum cup depth (P = 0.007); thinner GCC was independently associated with older age (P = 0.018), larger best-corrected visual acuity (P = 0.023), and higher VCDR (P = 0.002). Conclusions: RNFL but not GCC significantly increased with ONH size in healthy eyes. GCC may be more suitable than RNFL for evaluating early glaucoma in patients with large or small ONH. Translational Relevance: GCC may be a better index than RNFL for early glaucoma evaluation in patients with large or small ONH.

Indexed as

GlaucomaOptic DiskCross-Sectional StudiesHumansMaleNerve FibersRetinal Ganglion CellsTomography, Optical Coherence

Identifiers

PMID36971677
PMCPMC10064928
OpenAlexW4361000894

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.