ArticleThe British journal of radiology2023
Usefulness of augmented reality in radiological protection education and training for interventional radiologists.
Article in The British journal of radiology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Effectiveness of radiation protection educational material during angiography using visualization of scattered radiation by augmented reality technique.Radiological physics and technology · 2025Article
- HoloLensTherapeutic advances in urologyReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveThe aim of this work is to evaluate the usefulness of using augmented reality (AR) to train medical professionals in radiological protection (RP) in fluoroscopy.
methodsA Microsoft HoloLens 2 device has been used to simulate a fluoroscopic device. The teaching scenario considers a Philips Azurion able to rotate to pre-defined gantry positions,a dorsal decubitus patient and a ceiling shield. Radiation exposures were simulated using the FLUKA Monte Carlo code. 11 radiologists were asked to reproduce their positioning as per a clinical procedure and to correctly position the ceiling shield. Then, they were presented with the radiation exposure of their choices and were able to further optimise it. After the session, they were asked to complete a questionnaire.
resultsUsers rated the AR educational approach as Intuitive and relevant to RP education (35%) and inspiring to deepen their knowledge (18%). Nevertheless, a negative aspect was mainly the difficulty in dealing with the system (58%). Although the participants were radiologists, a minority recognised themselves as having accurate knowledge of the RP (18%), indicating a relevant knowledge gap.
conclusionThe usefulness of using AR in RP education for radiologists has been shown. The visual aid of such technology is likely to improve the consolidation of practical knowledge. ADVANCES IN KNOWLEDGE: The use of interactive teaching techniques has the possibility to both help radiology professionals consolidate their radiation protection training and confidence in their practices.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.