SynthesisInternational journal of geriatric psychiatry2023
A systematic review of specialty dementia care units in long-term care settings.
Synthesis in International journal of geriatric psychiatry, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Invested Partner Feedback on Technology Assistance in Dementia (Tech-AiD).Journal of applied gerontology : the official journal of the Southern Gerontological Society · 2026Article
- Medicaid Payments and Racial and Ethnic Disparities in Alzheimer Disease Special Care Units.JAMA network open · 2025Article
- Article
- Sentiment Dynamics Among Informal Caregivers in Web-Based Alzheimer Communities: Systematic Analysis of Emotional Support and Interaction Patterns.JMIR aging · 2024Article
- The symbiotic experiences of residents with and without dementia co-living in Taiwan's long-term care facilities: a phenomenological study.BMC geriatrics · 2024Article
- Clinical profiles of older adults in French Caribbean nursing homes: a descriptive cross-sectional study.Frontiers in medicine · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundAlzheimer's disease and related dementias (ADRD) are common among nursing home residents. Yet, conclusive evidence regarding best care practices among this population is lacking. Objectives of this systematic review were to explore features of dementia specialty care units (DSCUs) in long-term care settings and examine benefits for residents, staff, families, and facilities.
methodsPubMed, CINAHL, and PsychINFO were searched to identify articles involving DSCUs in long-term care settings published in English with full text available between 01.01.2008 and 06.03.2022. Articles containing empirical data about ADRD special care in long-term care settings were included in the review. Articles focused on clinic-based or out-patient dementia care programs (e.g., adult day care) were excluded. Articles were categorized based on geography (U.S. vs. international) and study design: interventions, descriptive studies, or comparison studies (traditional vs. specialty ADRD care).
resultsOur review included 38 U.S. articles and 54 articles from 15 international countries. In the U.S., 12 intervention, 13 descriptive, and 13 comparison studies met the inclusion criteria. Articles from international countries included 22 intervention, 20 descriptive, and 12 comparison studies. Results were mixed in terms of the efficacy of DSCUs. Promising DSCU features include small-scale settings, dementia-educated staff, and multidisciplinary approaches to care.
conclusionOverall, our review did not find conclusive evidence regarding the benefits of DSCUs in long-term care settings. No rigorous study designs were found examining 'special' features of DSCUs and associations with outcomes among residents, family, staff, and the facility. Randomized clinical trials are needed to disentangle the 'special' features of DSCUs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.