Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36971425›Full record

Trial reportMedical decision making : an international journal of the Society for Medical Decision Making2023

General-Purpose Methods for Simulating Survival Data for Expected Value of Sample Information Calculations.

Mathyn Vervaart, Eline Aas, Karl P Claxton, Mark Strong, Nicky J Welton, Torbjørn Wisløff, Anna Heath

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Medical decision making : an international journal of the Society for Medical Decision Making, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Calculating the Expected Net Benefit of Sampling for Survival Data: A Tutorial and Case Study.Medical decision making : an international journal of the Society for Medical Decision Making · 2024
    Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Mathyn VervaartDepartment of Health Management and Health Economics, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.ORCID 0000-0003-2678-0132
Eline AasDepartment of Health Management and Health Economics, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.
Karl P ClaxtonCentre for Health Economics, University of York, York, UK.
Mark StrongSchool of Health and Related Research (ScHARR), University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-1486-8233
Nicky J WeltonSchool of Social and Community Medicine, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK.
Torbjørn WisløffHealth Services Research Unit, Akershus University Hospital, Oslo, Norway.ORCID 0000-0002-7539-082X
Anna HeathChild Health Evaluative Sciences, The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-7263-4251

Funding

Medical Research Council G0802413Medical Research Council MR/K025643/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundExpected value of sample information (EVSI) quantifies the expected value to a decision maker of reducing uncertainty by collecting additional data. EVSI calculations require simulating plausible data sets, typically achieved by evaluating quantile functions at random uniform numbers using standard inverse transform sampling (ITS). This is straightforward when closed-form expressions for the quantile function are available, such as for standard parametric survival models, but these are often unavailable when assuming treatment effect waning and for flexible survival models. In these circumstances, the standard ITS method could be implemented by numerically evaluating the quantile functions at each iteration in a probabilistic analysis, but this greatly increases the computational burden. Thus, our study aims to develop general-purpose methods that standardize and reduce the computational burden of the EVSI data-simulation step for survival data.

methodsWe developed a discrete sampling method and an interpolated ITS method for simulating survival data from a probabilistic sample of survival probabilities over discrete time units. We compared the general-purpose and standard ITS methods using an illustrative partitioned survival model with and without adjustment for treatment effect waning.

resultsThe discrete sampling and interpolated ITS methods agree closely with the standard ITS method, with the added benefit of a greatly reduced computational cost in the scenario with adjustment for treatment effect waning.

conclusionsWe present general-purpose methods for simulating survival data from a probabilistic sample of survival probabilities that greatly reduce the computational burden of the EVSI data-simulation step when we assume treatment effect waning or use flexible survival models. The implementation of our data-simulation methods is identical across all possible survival models and can easily be automated from standard probabilistic decision analyses. HIGHLIGHTS: Expected value of sample information (EVSI) quantifies the expected value to a decision maker of reducing uncertainty through a given data collection exercise, such as a randomized clinical trial. In this article, we address the problem of computing EVSI when we assume treatment effect waning or use flexible survival models, by developing general-purpose methods that standardize and reduce the computational burden of the EVSI data-generation step for survival data.We developed 2 methods for simulating survival data from a probabilistic sample of survival probabilities over discrete time units, a discrete sampling method and an interpolated inverse transform sampling method, which can be combined with a recently proposed nonparametric EVSI method to accurately estimate EVSI for collecting survival data.Our general-purpose data-simulation methods greatly reduce the computational burden of the EVSI data-simulation step when we assume treatment effect waning or use flexible survival models. The implementation of our data-simulation methods is identical across all possible survival models and can therefore easily be automated from standard probabilistic decision analyses.

Indexed as

ProbabilityComputer SimulationCost-Benefit AnalysisData CollectionHumansUncertaintyeconomic evaluation modelexpected value of sample informationsimulation methodssurvival datavalue of information

Identifiers

PMID36971425
PMCPMC10336715

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.