ArticleCancer medicine2023
Development and external validation of nomograms for predicting individual survival in patients with ovarian clear cell carcinoma.
Article in Cancer medicine, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Clinical Value of an LDH-CA125-NLR Panel for Diagnosis, Platinum Resistance, and Prognostic Assessment in Epithelial Ovarian Cancer.Current oncology (Toronto, Ont.) · 2026Article
- Prognostic modeling of endometriosis-associated ovarian cancer based on molecular signatures: a retrospective study.Journal of ovarian research · 2025Article
- Development and external validation of nomograms for predicting individual survival in patients with ovarian clear cell carcinoma.Cancer medicine · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeOvarian clear cell carcinoma (OCCC) is a distinct and highly malignant subtype of ovarian cancer with high individual heterogeneity in survival that requires specific prognostic predictive tools. Thus, this study aimed to construct and validate nomograms for predicting individual survival in OCCC patients.
methodsIn total, 91 patients with OCCC who were diagnosed and treated at Renji Hospital between 2010 and 2020 were extracted as the training cohort, then 86 patients from the First Affiliated Hospital of USTC were used as the external validation cohort. Prognostic factors that affect survival were identified using least absolute shrinkage and selection operator regression. Nomograms of progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were then established with the Cox regression model and the performance was subsequently evaluated using the concordance index (C-index), calibration plots, decision curve analysis (DCA), and risk subgroup classification.
resultsAdvanced tumor, ascites of >400 mL, lymph node-positive, CA199 of >142.3 IU/mL, and fibrinogen of >5.36 g/L were identified as risk factors for OS while advanced tumor, ascites of >400 mL, lymph node-positive, and fibrinogen of >5.36 g/L were risk factors for PFS. The C-indexes for the OS and PFS nomograms were 0.899 and 0.731 in the training cohort and 0.804 and 0.787 in the validation cohort, respectively. The calibration plots showed that nomograms could provide better consistency in predicting patient survival than the FIGO staging system. DCA also demonstrated that nomograms were more clinically beneficial than the FIGO staging system. Additionally, patients could be classified into two risk groups based on scores using nomograms, with significant survival differences.
conclusionsWe developed nomograms that could more objectively and reliably predict the individual survival of patients with OCCC compared with the FIGO staging system. These tools might assist in clinical decision-making and management of patients with OCCC to improve their survival outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.