ArticleFrontiers in microbiology2023
Biotic interactions contribute more than environmental factors and geographic distance to biogeographic patterns of soil prokaryotic and fungal communities.
Article in Frontiers in microbiology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Taxon-Dependent Community Assembly of Bacteria and Protists in River Ecosystems: A Case Study from the Yujiang River.Microorganisms · 2025Article
- Understanding plant-microorganism interactions: The key roles of soil, rhizosphere, and direct and indirect mechanisms.AIMS microbiology · 2025Review
- The Potential of Co-Evolution and Interactions of Gut Bacteria-Phages in Bamboo-Eating Pandas: Insights from Dietary Preference-Based Metagenomic Analysis.Microorganisms · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Recent studies have shown distinct soil microbial assembly patterns across taxonomic types, habitat types and regions, but little is known about which factors play a dominant role in soil microbial communities. To bridge this gap, we compared the differences in microbial diversity and community composition across two taxonomic types (prokaryotes and fungi), two habitat types (Artemisia and Poaceae) and three geographic regions in the arid ecosystem of northwest China. To determine the main driving factors shaping the prokaryotic and fungal community assembly, we carried out diverse analyses including null model, partial mantel test and variance partitioning analysis etc. The findings suggested that the processes of community assembly were more diverse among taxonomic categories in comparison to habitats or geographical regions. The predominant driving factor of soil microbial community assembly in arid ecosystem was biotic interactions between microorganisms, followed by environmental filtering and dispersal limitation. Network vertex, positive cohesion and negative cohesion showed the most significant correlations with prokaryotic and fungal diversity and community dissimilarity. Salinity was the major environmental variable structuring the prokaryotic community. Although prokaryotic and fungal communities were jointly regulated by the three factors, the effects of biotic interactions and environmental variables (both are deterministic processes) on the community structure of prokaryotes were stronger than that of fungi. The null model revealed that prokaryotic community assembly was more deterministic, whereas fungal community assembly was structured by stochastic processes. Taken together, these findings unravel the predominant drivers governing microbial community assembly across taxonomic types, habitat types and geographic regions and highlight the impacts of biotic interactions on disentangling soil microbial assembly mechanisms.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.