ArticleFrontiers in neuroinformatics2023
Neural network-derived perfusion maps: A model-free approach to computed tomography perfusion in patients with acute ischemic stroke.
Article in Frontiers in neuroinformatics, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Machine learning models of segmentation in acute ischemic stroke: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Biomedical engineering online · 2026Pooled it
- Understanding CT Perfusion in Acute Ischemic Stroke: How Algorithms Shape Perfusion Maps.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- A scoping review of magnetic resonance angiography and perfusion image synthesis.Frontiers in dementia · 2024Article
- Assessment of Computed Tomography Perfusion Research Landscape: A Topic Modeling Study.Tomography (Ann Arbor, Mich.) · 2023Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: In this study, we investigate whether a Convolutional Neural Network (CNN) can generate informative parametric maps from the pre-processed CT perfusion data in patients with acute ischemic stroke in a clinical setting. Methods: The CNN training was performed on a subset of 100 pre-processed perfusion CT dataset, while 15 samples were kept for testing. All the data used for the training/testing of the network and for generating ground truth (GT) maps, using a state-of-the-art deconvolution algorithm, were previously pre-processed using a pipeline for motion correction and filtering. Threefold cross validation had been used to estimate the performance of the model on unseen data, reporting Mean Squared Error (MSE). Maps accuracy had been checked through manual segmentation of infarct core and total hypo-perfused regions on both CNN-derived and GT maps. Concordance among segmented lesions was assessed using the Dice Similarity Coefficient (DSC). Correlation and agreement among different perfusion analysis methods were evaluated using mean absolute volume differences, Pearson correlation coefficients, Bland-Altman analysis, and coefficient of repeatability across lesion volumes. Results: The MSE was very low for two out of three maps, and low in the remaining map, showing good generalizability. Mean Dice scores from two different raters and the GT maps ranged from 0.80 to 0.87. Inter-rater concordance was high, and a strong correlation was found between lesion volumes of CNN maps and GT maps (0.99, 0.98, respectively). Conclusion: The agreement between our CNN-based perfusion maps and the state-of-the-art deconvolution-algorithm perfusion analysis maps, highlights the potential of machine learning methods applied to perfusion analysis. CNN approaches can reduce the volume of data required by deconvolution algorithms to estimate the ischemic core, and thus might allow the development of novel perfusion protocols with lower radiation dose deployed to the patient.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.