ArticleAJOG global reports2023
Prepregnancy body mass index and adverse perinatal outcomes in the presence of other maternal risk factors.
Article in AJOG global reports, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.
- Pre-Pregnancy Body Mass Index, Diabetes Status, and Gestational Age-Specific Stillbirth Risk: A Nationwide Retrospective Cohort Study.BJOG : an international journal of obstetrics and gynaecology · 2026Article
- Impact of pre-pregnancy maternal body mass index on neonatal outcomes in twin delivery: A retrospective cohort study.Pakistan journal of medical sciences · 2025Article
- Nonlinear association between pre-pregnancy body mass index and preterm birth in singleton pregnancies conceived with assisted reproductive technology.Frontiers in nutrition · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundHigh prepregnancy body mass index is one of the most common risk factors for adverse perinatal events.
objectiveThis study aimed to assess whether the association between maternal body mass index and adverse perinatal outcome is modified by other concomitant maternal risk factors. STUDY
designThis was a retrospective cohort study of all singleton live births and stillbirths in the United States from 2016 to 2017, using data from the National Center for Health Statistics. Logistic regression was used to estimate the adjusted odds ratios and 95% confidence intervals between prepregnancy body mass index and a composite outcome of stillbirth, neonatal death, and severe neonatal morbidity. Modification of this association by maternal age, nulliparity, chronic hypertension, and prepregnancy diabetes mellitus was assessed on both multiplicative and additive scales.
resultsThe study population included 7,576,417 women with singleton pregnancy; 254,225 (3.5%) were underweight, 3,220,432 (43.9%) had normal body mass index, 1,918,480 (26.1%) were overweight, and 1,062,177 (14.4%), 516,693 (7.0%), and 365,357 (5.0%) had class I, II, and III obesity, respectively. Rates of the composite outcome increased with increasing body mass index above normal values, compared with women with normal body mass index. Nulliparity (289,776; 38.6%), chronic hypertension (135,328; 1.8%), and prepregnancy diabetes mellitus (67,744; 0.89%) modified the association between body mass index and the composite perinatal outcome on both the additive and multiplicative scales. Nulliparous (vs parous) women had a higher rate of increase in adverse outcomes with increasing body mass index. For example, in nulliparous women, class III obesity was associated with 1.8-fold higher odds compared with normal body mass index (adjusted odds ratio, 1.77; 95% confidence interval, 1.73-1.83), whereas in parous women, the adjusted odds ratio was 1.35 (95% confidence interval, 1.32-1.39). Women with chronic hypertension or prepregnancy diabetes mellitus had higher outcome rates overall; however, the dose-response relationship with increasing body mass index was absent. Although the composite outcome rates increased with maternal age, the risk curves were relatively similar across obesity classes in all maternal age groups. Overall, underweight women had 7% higher odds of the composite outcome, and this increased to 21% in parous women.
conclusionWomen with elevated prepregnancy body mass index are at increased risk of adverse perinatal outcomes, and the magnitude of these risks differs by concomitant risk factors, including prepregnancy diabetes mellitus, chronic hypertension, and nulliparity. In particular, in woman with chronic hypertension or prepregnancy diabetes mellitus, there is no impact of increasing body mass index on adverse perinatal outcomes. However, overall rates remain high, and prepregnancy prevention of hypertension and diabetes mellitus should be emphasized among all women irrespective of body mass index.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.