Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36970559›Full record

ArticleAEM education and training2023

Top emergency medicine faculty development papers since 2000: A Delphi study.

Christine T Luo, Jessica A Bailey, Lalena M Yarris, Joshua G Kornegay, Kimberly A Regner, Ryanne J Mayersak

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in AEM education and training, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Christine T LuoDepartment of Emergency Medicine Oregon Health & Science University Portland Oregon USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4677-0364
Jessica A BaileyDepartment of Emergency Medicine Oregon Health & Science University Portland Oregon USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3411-5178
Lalena M YarrisDepartment of Emergency Medicine Oregon Health & Science University Portland Oregon USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1277-2852
Joshua G KornegayDepartment of Emergency Medicine Oregon Health & Science University Portland Oregon USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5024-0569
Kimberly A RegnerDepartment of Emergency Medicine Oregon Health & Science University Portland Oregon USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5437-6781
Ryanne J MayersakDepartment of Emergency Medicine Oregon Health & Science University Portland Oregon USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objectives: Faculty development is essential for academic emergency physicians to maintain clinical skills and succeed in administrative and leadership roles and for career advancement and satisfaction. Faculty developers in emergency medicine (EM) may struggle to find shared resources to guide faculty development efforts in a way that builds on existing knowledge. We aimed to review the EM-specific faculty development literature since 2000 and come to a consensus about the most useful for EM faculty developers. Methods: A database search was conducted on the topic of faculty development in EM from 2000 to 2020. After identifying relevant articles, we performed a modified Delphi process in three rounds, using a team of educators with a range of experiences with faculty development and education research, to identify articles that would be most useful to a broad audience of faculty developers. Results: We identified 287 potentially relevant articles on the topic of EM faculty development, 244 from the initial literature search, 42 from manual review of the references of the papers meeting inclusion criteria, and one by our study group's recommendation. Thirty-six papers met final inclusion criteria and underwent full-text review by our team. The Delphi process yielded six articles that were deemed most highly relevant over the three rounds. Each of these articles is described here, along with summaries and implications for faculty developers. Conclusions: We present the most useful EM papers from the past two decades for faculty developers seeking to develop, implement, or revise faculty development interventions.

Identifiers

PMID36970559
PMCPMC10033851

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.