ArticleFrontiers in neurology2023
Clinical outcome, recanalization success, and time metrics in drip-and-ship vs. drive-the-doctor: A retrospective analysis of the HEI-LU-Stroke registry.
Article in Frontiers in neurology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Physician Transfer Versus Patient Transfer for Mechanical Thrombectomy in Patients With Acute Ischemic Stroke: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Journal of the American Heart Association · 2024Pooled it
- Article
- Drive-the-doctor paradigm in acute ischaemic stroke for improving regional stroke care networks: a cost-effectiveness analysis.BMJ open · 2025Article
- Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: This study aimed at comparing clinical outcome, recanalization success and time metrics in the "drip and ship" (DS) vs. "drive the doctor" (DD) concept in a comparable setting. Methods: This is a retrospective analysis of thrombectomy registries of a comprehensive stroke center (CSC) and a thrombectomy-capable stroke center (TSC). Patients, who were transferred from the TSC to the CSC, were classified as DS. Patients treated at the TSC by an interventionalist transferred from the CSC were classified as DD. Good outcome was defined as mRS 0-2 or equivalent to premorbid mRS at discharge. Recanalization (TICI 2b-3 or equivalent) and time metrics were compared in both groups. Results: In total, 295 patients were included, of which 116 (39.3%) were treated in the DS concept and 179 (60.7%) in the DD concept. Good clinical outcome was similarly achieved in DS and DD (DS 25.0% vs. DD 31.3%, Conclusion: The DD concept is time saving while achieving similar clinical outcome and recanalization results.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.