Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36970478›Full record

ArticleIndian journal of anaesthesia2023

Anaesthetic management of robot-assisted laparoscopic surgery.

Chhaya M Suryawanshi, Bhavini Shah, Sangeeta Khanna, Poonam Ghodki, Kanta Bhati, K V Ashok

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Indian journal of anaesthesia, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. NIRS monitoring during steep trendelenburg in robotic prostatectomy.Journal of clinical monitoring and computing · 2026
    Observational
  5. Article
  6. Anesthesia for robot-assisted surgery: a review.Anaesthesiology intensive therapy · 2025
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Chhaya M SuryawanshiDepartment of Anaesthesiology, Dr. D. Y. Patil Medical College, Hospital and Research Centre, Dr. D. Y. Patil Vidyapeeth, Pimpri, Pune, Maharashtra, India.
Bhavini ShahDepartment of Anaesthesiology, Dr. D. Y. Patil Medical College, Hospital and Research Centre, Dr. D. Y. Patil Vidyapeeth, Pimpri, Pune, Maharashtra, India.
Sangeeta KhannaDepartment of Anaesthesia, Medanta - The Medicity, Gurugram, Haryana, India.
Poonam GhodkiDepartment of Anaesthesia, Deenanath Mangeshkar Hospital and Research Centre, Pune, Maharashtra, India.
Kanta BhatiSardar Patel Government Medical College, Bikaner, Rajasthan, India.
K V AshokDepartment of Oncology and Transplant Services, HCG Hospital, Bengaluru, Karnataka, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Recent trend shows that minimally invasive surgery is in great demand. Robot-assisted procedures have become more popular, as they overcome several drawbacks of traditional laparoscopic techniques. Robotic surgery, however, might necessitate changes in how patients are positioned and how staff and equipment are organised generally, which might go against the traditional approach to anaesthesia care. The novel effects of this technology have the potential to produce paradigm-shifting therapeutic improvements. To provide better anaesthetic treatment and advance patient safety, anaesthesiologists should be aware of these developments by understanding the fundamental components of robotic surgical systems.

Indexed as

Anaesthesialaparoscopyrobotic-assisted surgery

Identifiers

PMID36970478
PMCPMC10034944

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.