Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36970476›Full record

ArticleIndian journal of anaesthesia2023

Update on preoperative evaluation and optimisation.

Parul Jindal, Vidya Patil, Rajeev Pradhan, Hitendra C Mahajan, Amutha Rani, Upender Gowd Pabba

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Indian journal of anaesthesia, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Observational
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Parul JindalDepartment of Anaesthesia, Himalayan Institute of Medical Sciences, SRHU, Swami Ram Nagar, Dehradun, Uttarakhand, India.
Vidya PatilDepartment of Anaesthesia, BLDE (DU) Shri B M Patil Medical College, Vijayapura, Karnataka, India.
Rajeev PradhanDepartment of Anaesthesia and Pain Clinic, Metas of Seven Day Multispeciality Hospital Surat, Gujarat, India.
Hitendra C MahajanDepartment of Anaesthesiology, Ashoka Medicover Hospital, Nashik, Maharashtra, India.
Amutha RaniDepartment of Anaesthesia, Tirunelveli Medical College Hospital, Tamil Nadu, India.
Upender Gowd PabbaDepartment of Anaesthesia, Asian Institute of Gastroenterology, Gachibowli, Hyderabad, Telangana, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The patients presenting for surgery today often belong to the extremes of age, have multiple co-morbidities, and undergo complex surgeries. This makes them more prone to morbidity and mortality. A detailed preoperative evaluation of the patient can contribute to reducing this mortality and morbidity. There are various risk indices and validated scoring systems and many of them need to be calculated using preoperative parameters. Their key objective is to identify patients vulnerable to complications and to return them to desirable functional activity as soon as possible. Any individual undergoing surgery should be optimised preoperatively, but special considerations should be given to patients with comorbidity, on multiple drugs, and undergoing high-risk surgery. The objective of this review is to put forth the latest trends in the preoperative evaluation and optimisation of patients undergoing noncardiac surgery and emphasise the importance of risk stratification in these patients.

Indexed as

Postoperative complicationspreoperative rehabilitationrisk assessment

Identifiers

PMID36970476
PMCPMC10034939

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.