ArticleJournal of traditional and complementary medicine2023
Cell-free
Article in Journal of traditional and complementary medicine, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.
- Review
- Review
- Deciphering the intratumor microbiota in malignant gastrointestinal tumors: multifaceted interplay and clinical implications.Cell communication and signaling : CCS · 2026Review
- Recent Research on the Role ofNutrients · 2026Review
- The Anti-Inflammatory, Immunomodulatory, and Pro-Autophagy Activities of Probiotics for Colorectal Cancer Prevention and Treatment: A Narrative Review.Biomedicines · 2025Review
- Luteolin in Inflammatory Bowel Disease and Colorectal Cancer: A Disease Continuum Perspective.Current issues in molecular biology · 2025Review
- Probiotic-Derived Metabolites fromBiomedicines · 2025Article
- The interplay between probiotics and host autophagy: mechanisms of action and emerging insights.Autophagy · 2025Review
- Article
- Gut microbiota: Implications in pathogenesis and therapy to cardiovascular disease (Review).Experimental and therapeutic medicine · 2024Review
- Appraisal of postbiotics in cancer therapy.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2024Review
- Three-DimensionalInternational journal of biological sciences · 2024Review
- Probiotic-Derived Bioactive Compounds in Colorectal Cancer Treatment.Microorganisms · 2023Review
- Editorial note: Gut microbiota and health.Journal of traditional and complementary medicine · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background and aim: Gut microbiota is considered as a complex organ of human body. The interaction between the host and microbiota is dynamic and controlled by a huge number of factors, such as lifestyle, geography, pharmaceuticals, diet, and stress. The breakdown of this relationship could change microbiota composition favoring the onset of several diseases, including cancer. Metabolites released by microbiota bacterial strains have been reported to elicit protective effects on the mucosa that could contrast cancer development and progression. Here, we tested the ability of specific probiotic strain Experimental procedure: The study was performed on two cell lines, HCT116 and HT29, cultured in 2D and 3D, and focused on the hallmarks of cell proliferation and migration. Results and conclusion: Probiotic metabolites reduced cell proliferation both in 2D and 3D-spheroid cultures, the latter model mimicking the growth
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.