ArticleJournal of contemporary brachytherapy2023
Feasibility of outpatient hybrid brachytherapy for cervical cancer with minimal sedation: Results from a single-institutional protocol.
Article in Journal of contemporary brachytherapy, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.
- Isoflurane as a cost-effective alternative to sevoflurane for short-duration gynaecological brachytherapy: a randomised non-inferiority trial of emergence.Journal of contemporary brachytherapy · 2025Article
- Outpatient hybrid intracavitary-interstitial brachytherapy for cervical cancer with minimal sedation in a freestanding setting.Gynecologic oncology reports · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: Pain control techniques during high-dose-rate hybrid intracavitary-interstitial brachytherapy (HBT) for cervical cancer vary widely, with many centers opting for general anesthesia (GA) or conscious sedation (CS). Here, we describe a single-institutional series of patients treated with HBT and ASA-defined minimal sedation, utilizing oral analgesic and anxiolytic medications in substitution for GA or CS. Material and methods: The charts of patients who underwent HBT treatments for cervical cancer from June 2018 to May 2020 were retrospectively reviewed. Prior to HBT, all patients underwent an exam under anesthesia (EUA), and Smit sleeve placement under general anesthesia or deep sedation. Oral lorazepam and oxycodone/acetaminophen were administered between 30-90 minutes before HBT procedure for minimal sedation. HBT placement was performed on computed tomography (CT) table, with needle advancement under CT-guidance. Results: Treatments with minimal sedation were attempted in 63 patients. A total of 244 interstitial implants with 453 needles were placed via CT-guidance. Sixty-one patients (96.8%) tolerated the procedure without any additional intervention, while two patients (3.2%) required the use of epidural anesthesia. None of the patients in the series required a transition to general anesthesia for the procedure. Bleeding, which resolved with short-term vaginal packing, occurred in 22.1% of insertions. Conclusions: In our series, the treatment of HBT for cervical cancer with minimal sedation was feasible at a high percentage (96.8%). The ability to perform HBT without GA or CS could be a reasonable option to provide image-guided adaptive brachytherapy (IGABT) with limited resources, allowing for more widespread use. Further investigations using this technique are warranted.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.