Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36970424›Full record

ArticleAntimicrobial stewardship & healthcare epidemiology : ASHE2023

Analysis of infections among patients with historical culture positive for extended-spectrum beta-lactamase (ESBL)-producing

Tyler J Stone, Michael DeWitt, James W Johnson, James R Beardsley, Iqra Munawar, Elizabeth Palavecino, Vera P Luther, Christopher A Ohl, John C Williamson

Full text read
In one paragraph

Article in Antimicrobial stewardship & healthcare epidemiology : ASHE, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Tyler J StoneDepartment of Pharmacy, Atrium Health Wake Forest Baptist, Winston-Salem, North Carolina.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3700-6639
Michael DeWittSection on Infectious Diseases, Department of Internal Medicine, Wake Forest University School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, North Carolina.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8940-1967
James W JohnsonDepartment of Pharmacy, Atrium Health Wake Forest Baptist, Winston-Salem, North Carolina.
James R BeardsleyDepartment of Pharmacy, Atrium Health Wake Forest Baptist, Winston-Salem, North Carolina.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3900-8758
Iqra MunawarSection on Infectious Diseases, Department of Internal Medicine, Wake Forest University School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, North Carolina.
Elizabeth PalavecinoDepartment of Pathology, Atrium Health Wake Forest Baptist, Winston-Salem, North Carolina.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4525-6064
Vera P LutherSection on Infectious Diseases, Department of Internal Medicine, Wake Forest University School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, North Carolina.
Christopher A OhlSection on Infectious Diseases, Department of Internal Medicine, Wake Forest University School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, North Carolina.
John C WilliamsonDepartment of Pharmacy, Atrium Health Wake Forest Baptist, Winston-Salem, North Carolina.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3840-7143

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: Among patients with a history of ESBL infection, uncertainty remains regarding whether all of these patients require ESBL-targeted therapy when presenting with a subsequent infection. We sought to determine the risks associated with a subsequent ESBL infection to help inform empiric antibiotic decisions. Methods: A retrospective cohort study of adult patients with positive index culture for Results: In total, 200 patients were included in the cohort, 100 with ESBL-producing EC/KP and 100 with ESBL-negative EC/KP. Of 100 patients (50%) who developed a subsequent infection, 22 infections were ESBL-producing EC/KP, 43 were other bacteria, and 35 had no or negative cultures. Subsequent infection caused by ESBL-producing EC/KP only occurred when the index culture was also ESBL-producing (22 vs 0). Among those with ESBL-producing index culture, the incidences of subsequent infection caused by ESBL-producing EC/KP versus other bacterial subsequent infection were similar (22 vs 18; Conclusions: History of ESBL-producing EC/KP culture is associated with subsequent infection caused by ESBL-producing EC/KP, particularly within 180 days after the historical culture. Among patients presenting with infection and a history of ESBL-producing EC/KP, other factors should be considered in making empiric antibiotic decisions, and ESBL-targeted therapy may not always be warranted.

Identifiers

PMID36970424
PMCPMC10031583

What OpenQuestion holds

Textfull text, public
LicenceCC BY
measurements read22
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.