ArticlePNAS nexus2023
Quantification of the spatial-temporal patterns of great ideas.
Article in PNAS nexus, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Quantitative understanding of the process of knowledge creation is crucial for accelerating the advance of science. Recent years have witnessed a great effort to address this issue by studying the publication data of scientific journals, leading to a variety of surprising discoveries at both individual level and disciplinary level. However, before scientific journals appeared on a large scale and became the mainstream for publishing research results, there are also intellectual achievements that have changed the world, which have usually become classic and are now referred to as the great ideas of great people. So far, little is known about the general law of their birth. In this paper, we reference Wikipedia and academic history books to collect 2001 magnum opuses as representations of great ideas, covering nine disciplines. Using the year and place of publication of these magnum opuses, we show that the birth of great ideas is very concentrated in geography, and more concentrated than other human activities such as contemporary knowledge production. We construct a spatial-temporal bipartite network to study the similarity of output structures between different historical periods and discover the existence of a Great Transformation around the 1870s, which may be associated with the rise of the US in academia. Finally, we re-rank cities and historical periods by employing an iterative approach to study cities' leadership and historical periods' prosperity.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.