ArticleMethodsX2023
A simultaneous, high-throughput and sensitive method for analysing 13 neonicotinoids and metabolites in urine using a liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry.
Article in MethodsX, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
A simultaneous, high-throughput and sensitive method for analysing nine neonicotinoid pesticides (NEOs) and four metabolites (NEOms) in urine using a liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MSMS) was developed. The method detection limit (MDL) and lowest concentration minimum reporting limit (LCMRL) of the nine NEOs were 0.0013-0.048 ng/ml and 0.0050-0.17 ng/ml, respectively. The MDL and LCMRL of the four NEOms were 0.0052-0.52 ng/ml and 0.011-1.6 ng/ml, respectively. Intermediate precision for the nine NEOs and four NEOms was 7.5-12.5% and 7.4-10.9%, respectively. Accuracy for the nine NEOs and four NEOms was 3.83-5.60% and 3.01-29.2%, respectively. The developed method was applied to analyse urine samples collected from participants of a large-scale birth cohort study, namely, the Japan Environment and Children's Study (JECS). •The NEO and NEOm concentrations in 100 µl urine samples were analysed using a highly sensitive LC-MSMS.•Automated solid phase extraction in a 96-well plate was utilised to achieve high-throughput analysis.•Intermediate precision and accuracy were less than 12.5% and 94.8-99.1%, respectively.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.