Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36969918›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in pain research (Lausanne, Switzerland)2023

Narrative review of current neuromodulation modalities for spinal cord injury.

Roi Medina, Alison Ho, Rajiv Reddy, Jeffrey Chen, Joel Castellanos

Open access · goldFull text readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in pain research (Lausanne, Switzerland), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
4.8field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Neuromodulation and the Gut-Brain Axis: Therapeutic Mechanisms and Implications for Gastrointestinal and Neurological Disorders.Pathophysiology : the official journal of the International Society for Pathophysiology · 2024
    Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Roi MedinaDepartment of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Lake Erie College of Osteopathic Medicine-Bradenton, Bradenton, FL, United States.
Alison HoDepartment of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Baylor University Medical Center, Dallas, TX, United States.
Rajiv ReddyUC San Diego Health, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA, United States.
Jeffrey ChenUC San Diego Health, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA, United States.
Joel CastellanosUC San Diego Health, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA, United States.
UC San Diego Health System · USBaylor University Medical Center · USLake Erie College of Osteopathic Medicine · USUniversity of California, San Diego · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Neuromodulation is a developing field of medicine that includes a vast array of minimally invasive and non-invasive therapies including transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS), transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS), vagus nerve stimulation (VNS), peripheral nerve stimulation, and spinal cord stimulation (SCS). Although the current literature surrounding the use of neuromodulation in managing chronic pain is abundant, there is an insufficient amount of evidence specifically regarding neuromodulation in patients with spinal cord injury (SCI). Given the pain and functional deficits that these patients face, that are not amenable to other forms conservative therapy, the purpose of this narrative review is to examine and assess the use of various neuromodulation modalities to manage pain and restore function in the SCI population. Currently, high-frequency spinal cord stimulation (HF-SCS) and burst spinal cord stimulation (B-SCS) have been shown to have the most promising effect in improving pain intensity and frequency. Additionally, dorsal root ganglion stimulation (DRG-S) and TMS have been shown to effectively increase motor responses and improve limb strength. Although these modalities carry the potential to enhance overall functionality and improve a patient's degree of disability, there is a lack of long-term, randomized-controlled trials in the current space. Additional research is warranted to further support the clinical use of these emerging modalities to provide improved pain management, increased level of function, and ultimately an overall better quality of life in the SCI population.

Indexed as

chronic paincomplete spinal cord injuryincomplete spinal cord injuryneuromodulationspinal cord injury (SCI)spinal cord stimulation (SCS)transcranial direct current simulationtranscranial magenetic stimulation (TMS)

Identifiers

PMID36969918
PMCPMC10033643
OpenAlexW4323666187

What OpenQuestion holds

Textfull text, public
LicenceCC BY
measurements read25
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.