ArticleJournal of multidisciplinary healthcare2023
Analysis of Risk Factors and Screening Results of Neonatal Congenital Hypothyroidism in a Tertiary Care Center of Southern China.
Article in Journal of multidisciplinary healthcare, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.
- [Impact of optimizing the quality control system on newborn screening outcomes for congenital hypothyroidism].Zhongguo dang dai er ke za zhi = Chinese journal of contemporary pediatrics · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: To explore the risk factors for neonatal congenital hypothyroidism (CH) and the influencing factors of false-positive results in CH screening. Methods: In this study, 255 neonatal patients with CH who completed the screening and further diagnosis and 366 neonates with positive CH screening results and normal thyroid function were selected as the case group. 246 healthy neonates with normal thyroid function were selected as the control group. Gestational age, birth-weight, maternal age, small for gestational age (SGA), perinatal factors (gestational thyroid dysfunction, gestational diabetes mellitus, etc.) were used as influencing factors, using Results: There were statistical differences in the SGA, maternal gestational diabetes mellitus, thyroid disease, and the proportion using assisted reproduction technology among the case group, false-positive screening group, and control group ( Conclusion: Neonatal CH and positive screening results are influenced by assisted reproduction, gestational thyroid dysfunction, gestational diabetes mellitus, and SGA.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.