ReviewJB & JS open access
Residency Match Rates in Orthopaedic Surgery Based on Sex, Under-Represented in Medicine Status, and Degree Type.
Review in JB & JS open access. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
21 citing papers in PubMed, 36 citations in OpenAlex.
- Effects of the allopathic and osteopathic graduate medical education merger on U.S. specialty training: a review.Medical education online · 2026Review
- Early Engagement, Lasting Impact: Predictors of Scholarly Activity in Orthopaedic Sports Medicine Fellowship Applicants.Orthopaedic journal of sports medicine · 2026Article
- There Is Increasing Osteopathic Representation Among Orthopaedic Sports Medicine Fellowship Applicants, in Addition to Increasing Match Rates, Whereas the Number of Female Applicants Remains Disproportionately Lower Than the Number of Women in Residency Programs.Arthroscopy, sports medicine, and rehabilitation · 2025Article
- Medical Student Perceptions of the Barriers to Entering Orthopaedic Surgery Differ by Gender.The clinical teacher · 2025Article
- Factors Influencing Growth in Gender Diversity Within Orthopaedic Surgery.Journal of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons. Global research & reviews · 2025Article
- Breaking the Glass Ceiling: Female Speaker Representation at the American Orthopaedic Foot & Ankle Society Annual Meetings Over Time.Foot & ankle orthopaedics · 2025Article
- The Impact of Applicant Sex on Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine Fellowship Letters of Recommendation: A Multisite Study.ATS scholar · 2025Article
- Article
- How Did Black and Hispanic Orthopaedic Applicants and Residents Compare to General Surgery Between 2015 and 2022?Clinical orthopaedics and related research · 2024Article
- Article
- A Bibliometric Analysis of the 500 Most Cited Papers in Orthopaedic Oncology.Journal of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons. Global research & reviews · 2024Article
- Comparison of Osteopathic (DO) and Allopathic (MD) Candidates Matching Into Selected Surgical Subspecialties.Cureus · 2023Article
- Evolution of Medical Students' Interest in Orthopaedic Surgery Careers from Matriculation to Graduation.JB & JS open accessReview
- Osteopathic Students Have Decreased Match Rates in Orthopaedic Surgery Compared with Allopathic Students.JB & JS open accessReview
- Case Reports in Education: A Virtual Orthopaedic Surgery Summit Enhances Medical Student Confidence in Preparedness for Orthopaedic Surgery Subinternships.JB & JS open accessReview
- Beyond Single Accreditation: Exploring Factors Influencing Selection of Osteopathic Medical Students in the Orthopaedic Surgery Residency Match.JB & JS open accessReview
- Orthopaedic Fellowship Match: How Do Degree and Gender Type Affect Match Success?JB & JS open accessReview
- The Real Match Rate? US DO Students Match Into Orthopaedic Surgery at Significantly Lower Rates than US MD Students Despite Single Accreditation.JB & JS open accessReview
- Impact of Medical School Ranking and Other Predictive Factors on the 2020 to 2022 Orthopaedic Surgery Match.JB & JS open accessReview
- The Impact of Preference Signaling on Interview Invitations and Match Outcomes in the 2023 to 2024 Orthopaedic Residency Cycle: A Retrospective Review.JB & JS open accessReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Orthopaedic surgery is well recognized as one of the most competitive and least diverse medical specialties. Despite efforts toward improving diversity, studies have shown that gender and racial/ethnic disparities continue to persist in orthopaedic graduate medical education. Therefore, we sought to identify the match rates of traditionally under-represented groups within orthopaedic surgery-female candidates, racial and ethnic minorities under-represented in medicine (URiM), and osteopathic physicians-compared with their application rates. Methods: A retrospective review of the Electronic Residency Application Service (ERAS) application data from the 2017 to 2021 application cycles was performed, and the total number of applicants, sex, race/ethnicity, and degree type of all students applying for orthopaedic surgery were recorded. A separate database, the Orthopaedic Residency Information Network (ORIN), which is a database self-reported by residency programs to provide information to applicants, was also queried to identify the total number of residents, sex, race/ethnicity, and degree type of all current residents in June 2022, corresponding to those residents who matched in 2017 to 2021. Results: From the ERAS application data, a total of 7,903 applicants applied to orthopaedic surgery during the study period. A total of 1,448 applicants (18%) were female, 1,307 (18%) were URiM, and 1,022 (15%) were from an osteopathic medical school. Based on the ORIN database, 688 of 3,574 residents (19%) were female, 1,131 of 7,374 (19%) were URiM, and 1,022 of US medical school graduates (12%) had a DO degree. The application and match rates were not significantly different for female (p = 0.249) and URiM (0.187) applicants; however, there was a significant difference in the application and match rates (15% vs 12%; p = 0.035) for US medical graduates with a DO degree. Conclusion: In recent years, there has been a significant and necessary push to increase diversity in the field of orthopaedic surgery. From 2017 to 2021, match rates of female and URiM candidates are reflective of their application rates. Osteopathic applicants in orthopaedic surgery have a lower match rate than their allopathic counterparts. Level of Evidence: III.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.