SynthesisFrontiers in public health2023
Blended learning in physical education: A systematic review.
Synthesis in Frontiers in public health, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
21 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Pooled it
- Responsibility of education in improving medical college students' ability to prevent and respond to public health emergencies in China - A systematic review.Frontiers in public health · 2023Pooled it
- Application and effectiveness of blended learning in biochemistry laboratory courses: a multi-class controlled study.BMC medical education · 2025Trial
- Effectiveness of blended learning to improve medical students' communication skills: a randomized, controlled trial.BMC medical education · 2025Trial
- Effects of blended learning in physical education on university students' exercise attitudes and basketball skills: a cluster randomized controlled trial.BMC public health · 2024Trial
- The effects of a blended learning model on the physical fitness of Chinese university students: a cluster randomized controlled trial in basketball education.BMC public health · 2024Trial
- Predictive analysis of student engagement in university physical education courses based on a multimodal transformer algorithm.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Comparative analysis of traditional and metaverse-based education: impacts on students' all-round development.BMC psychology · 2026Article
- A quasi-experimental study of the video-based "Did You Know?" blended learning model in physical education: Impact on motor skills, knowledge acquisition, and motivation in gymnastics.Frontiers in psychology · 2026Article
- Associations between generative AI use frequency, technology acceptance, attitudes toward AI, and reported learning preference patterns among students in physical education classes.Frontiers in sports and active living · 2026Article
- The relationship between sleep quality and physical learning engagement among Chinese college students: a variable centered and person centered analysis.Frontiers in public health · 2026Article
- Enhancing motor skill acquisition and autonomous motivation in university physical education: a randomized controlled trial of a STEAM-integrated approach.Frontiers in psychology · 2026Article
- Application and effectiveness of blended learning in medical imaging via the technology acceptance model.BMC medical education · 2025Article
- Commentary: Blended learning in physical education: a systematic review.Frontiers in public health · 2025Article
- Optimization of school physical education schedules to enhance long-term public health outcomes.Frontiers in public health · 2025Article
- Addressing physical skills and mental health: the role of modern teaching approaches in non-athlete university PE programs.Frontiers in psychology · 2025Article
- Design and evaluation of a blended basketball training program using the ADDIE model.PloS one · 2025Article
- Effects of Pilates on Body Posture: A Systematic Review.Archives of rehabilitation research and clinical translation · 2024Review
- Effects of Pilates exercises on spine deformities and posture: a systematic review.BMC sports science, medicine & rehabilitation · 2024Article
- Multilevel modeling of technology use, student engagement, and fitness outcomes in physical education classes.Frontiers in psychology · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This review aims to provide a detailed overview of the current status and development trends of blended learning in physical education by reviewing journal articles from the Web of Science (WOS) database. Several dimensions of blended learning were observed, including research trends, participants, online learning tools, theoretical frameworks, evaluation methods, application domains, Research Topics, and challenges. Following the guidelines of the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA), a total of 22 journal articles were included in the current review. The findings of this review reveal that the number of blended learning articles in physical education has increased since 2018, proving that the incorporation of online learning tools into physical education courses has grown in popularity. From the reviewed journal articles, most attention is given to undergraduates, emphasizing that attention in the future should be placed on K-12 students, teachers, and educational institutions. The theoretical framework applied by journal articles is also limited to a few articles and the assessment method is relatively homogeneous, consisting mostly of questionnaires. This review also discovers the trends in blended learning in physical education as most of the studies focus on the topic centered on dynamic physical education. In terms of Research Topics, most journal articles focus on perceptions, learning outcomes, satisfaction, and motivation, which are preliminary aspects of blended learning research. Although the benefits of blended learning are evident, this review identifies five challenges of blended learning: instructional design challenges, technological literacy and competency challenges, self-regulation challenges, alienation and isolation challenges, and belief challenges. Finally, a number of recommendations for future research are presented.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.