ArticleFrontiers in public health2023
Association between PM
Article in Frontiers in public health, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 18 citations in OpenAlex.
- Estimating the economic burden of lower respiratory infections in China from 2020 to 2040: a health-augmented macroeconomic modelling study.The Lancet regional health. Western Pacific · 2026Article
- A systematic review of the pivotal role of environmental toxicant exposure on infectious diseases in low- and middle-income countries.Public health in practice (Oxford, England) · 2025Review
- Frequentist Grouped Weighted Quantile Sum Regression for Correlated Chemical Mixtures.Statistics in medicine · 2025Article
- Fine particulate matter manipulates immune response to exacerbate microbial pathogenesis in the respiratory tract.European respiratory review : an official journal of the European Respiratory Society · 2024Review
- Long-term exposure to PMScientific reports · 2024Article
- Association between ambient air pollutants and short-term mortality risks during 2015-2019 in Guangzhou, China.Frontiers in public health · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: The adverse effects of 2.5-μm particulate matter (PM Objectives: Given the vulnerability of children's respiratory system, aim to pediatric respiratory health, this study evaluated the potential sources, health risks, and acute health effects of ambient PM Methods: Potential sources of PM Results: During 2017-2019, the daily mean concentrations of PM Conclusions: Our findings showed that PM
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.