ArticleFrontiers in physiology2023
Potential biomarkers for late-onset and term preeclampsia: A scoping review.
Article in Frontiers in physiology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
15 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- First-trimester ophthalmic artery Doppler for prediction of early-onset and preterm preeclampsia: a systematic review and critical appraisal.BMC pregnancy and childbirth · 2026Pooled it
- Systematic review of the complement components as potential biomarkers of pre-eclampsia: pitfalls and opportunities.Frontiers in immunology · 2024Pooled it
- Influential Serum Kinases (Non-sFlt-1) and Phosphatases in Preeclampsia-Systemic Review and Metanalysis.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023Pooled it
- Preeclampsia among Omani women: prevalence and associated risk factors.Frontiers in global women's health · 2026Article
- A New Model for Screening for Late-Onset Preeclampsia in the Third Trimester.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Article
- Circulating Plasma Syncytin-1 mRNA in Preeclampsia-A Pilot Study.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Article
- Potential Molecular Biomarkers of Preeclampsia-A Pilot Study.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Article
- Proteome-Based Maternal Plasma and Serum Biomarkers for Preeclampsia: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Current Approaches and Innovations in Managing Preeclampsia: Highlighting Maternal Health Disparities.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Review
- Methodology for Biological Sample Collection, Processing, and Storage in the Newcastle 1000 Pregnancy Cohort: Protocol for a Longitudinal, Prospective Population-Based Study in Australia.JMIR research protocols · 2024Article
- Epigenetic alterations in preeclampsia: a focus on microRNA149 and tetrahydrofolate reductase gene polymorphisms in Egyptian women.Irish journal of medical science · 2024Article
- Hypertension in Pregnancy: Current Challenges and Future Opportunities for Surveillance and Research.Journal of women's health (2002) · 2024Article
- A case-based narrative review of pregnancy-associated atypical hemolytic uremic syndrome/complement-mediated thrombotic microangiopathy.Kidney international · 2024Article
- Epigenetic biomarker for preeclampsia-associated preterm birth and potential preventative medicine.Environmental epigenetics · 2024Article
- Use of cell-free signals as biomarkers for early and easy prediction of preeclampsia.Frontiers in medicine · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Preeclampsia is a progressive, multisystem pregnancy disorder. According to the time of onset or delivery, preeclampsia has been subclassified into early-onset (<34 weeks) and late-onset (≥34 weeks), or preterm (<37 weeks) and term (≥37 weeks). Preterm preeclampsia can be effectively predicted at 11-13 weeks well before onset, and its incidence can be reduced by preventively using low-dose aspirin. However, late-onset and term preeclampsia are more prevalent than early forms and still lack effective predictive and preventive measures. This scoping review aims to systematically identify the evidence of predictive biomarkers reported in late-onset and term preeclampsia. This study was conducted based on the guidance of the Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) methodology for scoping reviews. The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis extension for scoping reviews (PRISMA-ScR) was used to guide the study. The following databases were searched for related studies: PubMed, Web of Science, Scopus, and ProQuest. Search terms contain "preeclampsia," "late-onset," "term," "biomarker," or "marker," and other synonyms combined as appropriate using the Boolean operators "AND" and "OR." The search was restricted to articles published in English from 2012 to August 2022. Publications were selected if study participants were pregnant women and biomarkers were detected in maternal blood or urine samples before late-onset or term preeclampsia diagnosis. The search retrieved 4,257 records, of which 125 studies were included in the final assessment. The results demonstrate that no single molecular biomarker presents sufficient clinical sensitivity and specificity for screening late-onset and term preeclampsia. Multivariable models combining maternal risk factors with biochemical and/or biophysical markers generate higher detection rates, but they need more effective biomarkers and validation data for clinical utility. This review proposes that further research into novel biomarkers for late-onset and term preeclampsia is warranted and important to find strategies to predict this complication. Other critical factors to help identify candidate markers should be considered, such as a consensus on defining preeclampsia subtypes, optimal testing time, and sample types.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.