Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36969573›Full record

ArticleCytotechnology2023

Tadashi Yoshida, Ikumi Hamaji, Takeshi Hashimoto, Takuya Matsumoto, Makoto Hattori

Open access · greenAbstract read
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Cytotechnology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
0.2field-weighted citation impact, top 44% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Tadashi Yoshida *Department of Applied Biological Science, Tokyo University of Agriculture and Technology, 3-5-8 Saiwai-Cho, Fuchu, Tokyo 183-8509 Japan.
Ikumi Hamaji *Department of Applied Biological Science, Tokyo University of Agriculture and Technology, 3-5-8 Saiwai-Cho, Fuchu, Tokyo 183-8509 Japan.
Takeshi Hashimoto *Department of Applied Biological Science, Tokyo University of Agriculture and Technology, 3-5-8 Saiwai-Cho, Fuchu, Tokyo 183-8509 Japan.
Takuya Matsumoto *Department of Applied Biological Science, Tokyo University of Agriculture and Technology, 3-5-8 Saiwai-Cho, Fuchu, Tokyo 183-8509 Japan.
Makoto HattoriDepartment of Applied Biological Science, Tokyo University of Agriculture and Technology, 3-5-8 Saiwai-Cho, Fuchu, Tokyo 183-8509 Japan.
Tokyo University of Agriculture and Technology · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

β-Conglycinin was conjugated with ε-polylysine (PL) by means of microbial transglutaminase (MTGase) to improve its function. The β-conglycinin-PL conjugate was purified by dialysis. Composition of the β-conglycinin-PL was β-conglycinin:PL = 1:18 (molar ratio) which was confirmed by amino acid analysis. The β-conglycinin-PL was further conjugated with dextran (Dex) by the Maillard reaction. The β-conglycinin-PL-Dex conjugate was purified by dialysis. Conjugation was confirmed by SDS-PAGE and PAS staining. Composition of the β-conglycinin-PL-Dex was β-conglycinin-PL:Dex = 1:41 (molar ratio) which was confirmed by UV spectra measurement and phenol sulfuric acid method. Solubility of β-conglycinin in the acidic range was much improved by conjugation with PL and further improved by further conjugation with Dex. Emulsifying property of β-conglycinin in acidic pH range was much improved by conjugation with PL and Dex. Immunogenicity of β-conglycinin was decreased by conjugation with PL and Dex.

Indexed as

Emulsifying propertyProtein conjugationReduced immunogenicitySolubilityβ-Conglycinin

Identifiers

PMID36969573
PMCPMC10030745
OpenAlexW4313559140

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.